My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/15/2001 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
2/15/2001 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2018 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
2/28/2018 1:10:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/15/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
stated the proposed septic system technically is not considered <br /> to be a denitrification unit as it does not release any nitrogen, <br /> (There is no leaching, the materials are pumped off site. <br /> There being no further Commission or public input, the <br /> Chairman entertained a motion. <br /> NOTION: Ralph Shaw rade a motion to continue this matter to <br /> March 1, 2001, at 7:45 p.m. , per Applicant ' s request; which <br /> motion was seconded by Carol Moore and so voted unanimously. <br /> 7 : 30-Donna. Buchanan, Determination of Applicability on a <br /> proposal to rebuild existing decks with additions and removal of <br /> trees at 58 summersea Road, Assessor' s Reap 105, Block 33 . RDA <br /> The Chairman recognized Dill Buchanan, who made references <br /> to the plan indicating the existing dwelling, existing decks, <br /> proposed area of tree removal one pitch pine growing through the <br /> deck and those along the marsh front) . The Assistant Agent has <br /> suggested blueberry bush plantings as compensation for tree <br /> removal . The roadside- trees being located next to the deck and <br /> are considered to be overpowering. The dwelling having been <br /> constructed prior to 1975, making the deck area unsafe at this <br /> point and in meed of replacement . The deck on the love side to be <br /> replaced with no changes; the proposed deck to the back with <br /> additions to enlarge the area in order to accommodate a stairway <br /> necessary for access. <br /> References were being made to existing sonnatubes, with a <br /> request for three additional sonnatubes. <br /> Diane Boretos stated this to be one of the most wooded lots <br /> in New Seabury. The growth of Hemlocks making it difficult to <br /> utilize the front doorway, she acknowledged Applicant ' s desire <br /> to clear. the area in order to enjoy sorry sunlight . she has <br /> requested that certain pitch pine trees not be removed. she <br /> recommended a Negative-2 Determination. <br /> There being no further Commission or public input, the <br /> Chairman entertained a motion. <br /> MOTION: Mike Talbot rade a Motion for Negative-2 <br /> Determination; <br /> egative- <br /> eterination; which Motion was seconded by carol Moore and so <br /> voted unanimously. <br /> 7 : 35-Patricia Cowhig, Determination of Applicability on <br /> proposed vista pruning and removal of dead hazardous trees at <br /> 44 Little Neck- Lane, Assessorl s map los, Block 13 . <br /> Mr. Sherman has suggested to Mr. Allenby the possibility of <br /> approval as an RDA, as opposed to NOI . The project is located on <br /> a coastal bank, there is a total of six trees, with less than <br /> ten 1 percent removal on any given tree. Ir. Allenby has <br /> -7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.