My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/19/2004 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
8/19/2004 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 5:19:00 PM
Creation date
3/2/2018 2:36:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/19/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Motion madel seconded and unanimously carried.to approve the plan. <br /> 8.20 a.m., Alan Melzer, 51 Sunset Circ.�e (remove nuisance vegetation, beach nourishment, <br /> construct walks, driveway, landscape). John Slavinsky represented the applicant and presented <br /> the plan. Michael said they are asking to remove vegetation on the BVW and recommended <br /> they come back with a plan that complies with our regulations. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously car ed to grant a continuance to September 2 at <br /> 7:40 .ren-,with the agreement of the applicant. <br /> 8:25 p.m., 1�Lawrence errick, 1 o 1lheelhouse Lane(vista pruning and landscaping plantings). <br /> Brian Casey represented the applicant and presented the plan. Michael said in our vista <br /> pruning guidelines we generally like to have the path included in the vista corridor., rather than <br /> separate where the path is a vista corridor itself. It the corridor is shifted over to the path, it <br /> would still give a vier of the dock. The history of the property was that dere was an illegal <br /> cutting, then a mitigation planting,, then the mitigation trees were cut. We made it prem clear <br /> that we would not entertain a vista pruning until there was evidence that the oaks --either those <br /> planted or those allowed to re-grow—would actually be to a point of replacing some of the <br /> substanbal alterations. Mr. Casey said he is only asking for 20 ft. and he thinks he"s allowed 30 <br /> ft. –he thinks the frontage is 130 ft: Michael agreed that the corridor is conservative and could <br /> have been expanded. in vier of the history of the property, Jack.recommended that Mike visit <br /> the site before we rake a decision. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to grant a continuance to September 2 at <br /> 7:45 p.m., with the agreement of the applicant. <br /> Meeting adjourned at :01 p.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> { <br /> 4alk <br /> Frances Wise# Board Secretary <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.