|
!w •
<br /> Board of Health Meeting, October 1 , 1984 Page
<br /> (Arlene Wilson) they are at the point D E where anything below
<br /> 15, 000 gpd , they just don' t have the manpower to monitor, we say
<br /> we 've got a potential problem- therei or cotuit could have a potential
<br /> problem there because it' s in their water re-charge area, wo we talked
<br /> 4 a to them and we kinder gat them thinking, they were going to send down
<br /> Harry down (or who was it, Harry?) they were going to look into it
<br /> again because of what Arlene had told them, they' hadn' t even known
<br /> about. "
<br /> CFB: "They had nothing formal presented to them. "
<br /> CHL: "We presented it to them at that time and of course tela them
<br /> f the juggling of the figures, in order to come in slightly under-
<br /> what the requirements are, we felt that it was a way to skin the sheep
<br /> a little more, and not to ,do what we would ekpect to be done.
<br /> Mr. Wool: "OK, I guess what we, my--,Boa-rd dnduour super intendants,
<br /> reviewed the survey that they dial of these ten projects they dict,
<br /> and as far as I 'm concerned Deer crossing is not a viable project
<br /> to use for density yet, South. cape is. not viable- because - it is Time
<br /> Sharing, I can down now and pull ten names, developments or I can
<br /> pull four out of the Green company alone, wham I 've worked for, that
<br /> whole thing is a matter of delving in numbers. So, two questions I
<br /> guess that I have 1 what is 208 2 Do I personally go ahead
<br /> with the information I now have Twill get more infor tomorrow) I 've
<br /> been invited over to get more background and documentation, do you
<br /> i
<br /> think it advisable for me to go to DEE personally and show them what
<br /> I 've got strike work advisable insert a benefit) . "
<br /> CHL: "Well, I don' t think it' s going to hurt any, they' re coming in
<br /> on that well, CharFlie, that they didn' t even know about. "
<br /> fiet becomes es imtoake, F
<br /> FB. "There' s another avenue of approach aegg
<br /> and that is an examin tion' of a non-community water supply and go in
<br /> through than on a question of the whole bit, is this one parcel of pro-
<br /> perty, has it been artificially divided, where is the initial owner-
<br /> ship, hwere is the initial development and who is. respnsible. At this
<br /> stage of the game, where we have nothing really befofre our Planning
<br /> Board to say, I wonder if a statement to the Planning Board in Towyn
<br /> from you might not be as effective, I 'm not saying ignore DE E, but I
<br /> think both ways should be advanced on. "
<br /> CHL: "For the short length of time I think hitting the Planning Board
<br /> f first, get your. . . .as I have here from Terry, Dunning & Teary which are
<br /> the counselors for Beechwood Point, Lebel-Shields subdivision. - They were
<br /> in last week with nothing definitive, and we made that plain that we are
<br /> not going to comment one way or the other, because we' re not being shown
<br /> where anything is being located.
<br /> Mr, Wool: "Then what. is coring before the Planning Board, I was told that
<br /> they were corning in, you mean they haven' t submitted definitive plains for
<br /> building lay-out?"
<br /> CHL: "Is this what they just brought in Charlie?"
<br /> FB: "'Anis is what they just brought in. "
<br /> CHL: "Like what they brought in on the other one down there, watersedge,
<br /> we can see the sane consulting firm � doing the same type of tap dance
<br />
|