| 
								           	GRC- Let me i nterupt,  I'm familiar with the house on heart Neck- Rd. I don't think that house should be lived
<br />       	in at all. There are several violations that have to be corrected, wiring, electrical etc. when EAM inspect-
<br />      	e
<br />		d those pep I e were l i v i n  theme and you were paying their .rent.
<br />   ,JJthis goes back before my time. But as a result of this we've adopted more stringent policies at our
<br /> 		dice, which states unequivocally that noone is to occupy a dwelling without first passing our inspection.
<br />      	This will not happen again.
<br />       	E Ni- We're re mane than willing to work w/you. We gust don't want to duplicate our efforts and waste our tirrre
<br />      	as I'm sure you don't. fly fee 1 i ng is that we should not be asked to i npect until you are fully satisfied
<br />      	that the unit is livable. Not prior to ,your inspection or intermediate inspection,
<br />      	NE- That'  -the way we've been handling it ever since I received your letter. My only concern is the delay
<br />      	this will cause waiting for your inspection. Haw long will this take, three weed  '
<br />      	ENI-No, when we receive an inspection request it is usually arranged within 4 hours. The only exception is
<br />      	when we have trouble locating the owner or the person with a key to let ust in and this happens frequently.
<br />      	CRC- i don't I i ke EAM or LG going out to do inspections if you're just using it for a signature. They were
<br />      	both concerned because their recommendations were not attended to, We don't want to waste the taxpayers
<br />      	money. I'd gust as soon not have them inspect If that's the case.
<br />      	NE- We're concerned  /the safety of the people aswell. If ,you're not going to pass a place we won't let any-
<br />      	one move in. That's why we can't get into a lease agreement until we receive ,your approval*
<br />      	GRC- EAM and I went bank and forth for two days  /that B I ak roan property,  1 i sten i rig to their cel a i rrt , ect.
<br />      	NE- Let me tell ,you wbatts going  /that. Three wens ago Blakeman approached us saying he was ready to rent
<br />       	it ourt again. We told him that we needed inspection reports back from the Building, Fire, Wiring Depts
<br />      	before we would even cons i der doing an inspection. 1 e've'made significant progress ars far as str ingengy.
<br />      	We have good controls now.,
<br /> 											r
<br />      	The procedure is: we receive a request frorn a proposed tenant. At which time  e arrange an inspection within
<br />       	10 days, then Bob goes out and inspects,  if he .finds s  r eth i ng s 'wrong he gives the  -3 weeks to do the repa i r
<br />      	BS- I only inspect for Mate Sanitary Code, not Building or Wiring etc. If I find something questionable, I'd
<br />      	refer it to ,you; r the Bldg, Dept.      		_  		Y
<br />      	NE- Once the unit passesiour4inspec�tlon we send!a request to.,you to inspect.    	{
<br /> 		C-   ,y can't your arrange t6'do thin together,; ,you and EAS'? �	� +��#  ,- � '     	J
<br />     		It would be too hard to schedule, BS covers too large an area I'M sure.  I think if we have it worked out
<br />    JPthe way I understand i t, when we won't even be asked to inspect unt i l ,youare satisfied, and we can got outthere within 48 hours, it should work out fine., L don'' think rR-ny instance-s wi l l occur where you have missed
<br />      	something crucial in ,your inspection that will be noticed:'by u  and thus d lay  ccupancy. Do you, LG, .have
<br />      	anything to add, you've been involved in all the latest inspections?
<br />      	LG- I think  you've coven everthir� .A I did have to get the  uilding+Dept: involved in my last inspection.
<br />      	FfiM- I'm satisfied,  if we can carry it'out to lay we've ourtlined 4it here.
<br />      	CFB- Will the system stay as is if you leave tcmorrcw
<br />      	NE-- Yes, certainly.  If you have a hard time getting entry, LG, call me and perhaps I can help.
<br />      	Meeting with Forward Developrnen-t Corp RE; Quashnet Woods (Special Permit Process
<br />      	Attending: Greg Maclsaac- Forward Dev.
<br />     			Joseph Bream      "       "
<br />     			John Hollywood- Sasaki
<br />     			Richard Feller- E.d.Flynn
<br />     			Alex Ditami--     Forward Dev.
<br />      	C FB-lie have a formal application under Art i c I e 93 Open Space I recent i ve Program under Town by-laws.
<br />       	D- Ike'rye -here as part of the preliminary requ i red hearings pr i or to going before the planning board. The purpose
<br />       	f this meeting is-to get BOH input as far as the design of the project, have you write up your concerns so
<br />      	that we can make adjustments if requ i reed and have the R l ann i ng Board be made aware then them. under this proposal
<br />      	we will be donating 280 acres to the town and in return we will be bur i l d i ng 580 units on 100 acres c f land on
<br />      	the East side of the Quashnet River.  (indicates on rip location .
<br />    469H-Highlights location of pumping station on locus map, page 2. Locates Treatment Plant site. as far as passible
<br />       	rte, Riven.- five proposed ping stations plus one gravity fed., velocity minim 2'/sec. Precast manholes and PITC
<br />      	sewes.
<br />      	RIS- Referencing Feaability Report submitted to BOH and DEE. After the forced mains and gravity sewers it will be
<br />      	accumulated into 2 1 a rge underground tanks.  (holding and equalization) Dual pins    a I arms. w
<br />      	auto-dial. Treatammnt process designed for 141,000 gals/day - 2 primary clarifyers, 2 abic RBC's and surged
<br />      	RBC'c folloewd bi secondary settling tanks. & c1a ifye s• Next, purrs cher to underground leaching chambers.
<br />
								 |