|
-3-
<br /> 15,
<br /> 3!15* Plan relocate,l each i , Gary Tavares, 551 Troon i P l ace, EAM stked they 5 p l n to put a swi rrm i ng pool where
<br /> the existing leaching is-.located. EAM'was there and agrees w/the proposedrrelo ation. BOH to witness soils at
<br /> tine of excavation," If necessary a short pit will be used instead of a 6x6. H-20 pit to be used. Nation to
<br /> 640prove plan RLW,, second RGC,, variance approved if needed at Agent's discretion.
<br /> 6. Plan relocate leach ng, doe~Dim 'io '5"3 Forest Drive. EAM: this was first submitted w distances t
<br /> abbutting wells. We sent it back, and he determined that thea are no wells within 100' af proposed leaching
<br /> site. BOH should be aware that the tank is 1OOOgal s EAM feels its ok as long as six mks later the owner doesn't
<br /> decide to add 3 bedrooms. In approving this. plan we are not appr ving any additions, to be-stated on plan. Nation
<br /> 9
<br /> to approve RLW, second CRC.
<br /> 17.Per extensin request, M6riano, 59 Leather Leaf Lane.. EAM this would be a -second extension, hoever the first
<br /> was granted to the developper , and this request carnes from the recent buyer. six month extension, Motion PLW,
<br /> second RLW.
<br /> 18. R l an ria i upgrade septic, Laute, Dakar Trad i ng. Post. EAM: plans are to expand the store to include
<br /> del 1 type kitchen to preparre sandwiches for sale,-no tables and chairs, but a.coffmrc 1 a I kitchen, ..thus
<br /> grease trap. GRC: with an addition and an icreasen septic, grease trap, we should require engineering plans.
<br /> GRC: send this back and ask for complete engineering plans. EAM a4ier should be aware of grease reg and
<br /> floor plan must be submitted. Mation to deny plan RLW, second RGC.
<br /> 19. Plan, emergency repair, 0iMa gio for Muir, 31 Wilson's Grove. RLW assured RX that this is an emergency
<br /> repair. Letter submitted to BOH f rare abburtor at 35 Wilson's Grove stating no objection to the i n sta l I at i on
<br /> of leaching for Muir within 10' of property line, D i%gg i o to resubmit p 1 an making it rnore legible. and pre-
<br /> nt l y. Nation to approve w hew plan RLW, secon RCC subject to new plan and Agent inspection.
<br /> 20. P l n, septic repair, Ron's excavating for Hansford on Uncle Percy's. Statement from H i ghwoad that abbuttors
<br /> have paid deposit. Nbtion to approve repair subject to either the abburting wells 100+' away from leaching or
<br /> subject to proof that HighmDod water is flowing to abbutters, RLW, second RGC.
<br /> 21* Plan, repair/upgrade septic system, BOH variance request, Warwick for G. Kaplan, 30 Fells Road Road.
<br /> ruthis i 1 l -have to go t ConCom and Appeals, fr m BOH they need variance fry 100' setback fr~ wetland
<br /> leaching. They're at 88' and 921 according to p l ars, also sideline setback f r�om 10 to ' t .road not an
<br /> butter, New design can accamadate 4 bdrms o grinder. Motion to approve subject to Conte and Appeals, RLW,
<br /> second PGC. -
<br /> 22. Preliminary subdivision plan, Bingham/Rod & Gun, Holes & M Grath (M28/L15, M29/Ll = 40 lots) resubmitted.
<br /> Wells and Septics to be designated; GRC: standard comment, drains, wetlarxls and distances.
<br /> 23. Revisions to proposed Treatment Plant, Cranberry Hallow. Earlier staterknt received indicated revisions,
<br /> SOH asked thea to explain revisions. Ulti ate apprval will be from-DE E. EAM: they mst be increasing the #
<br /> f units drastically -to drastically-tobe increasing pretreatment tank from 17,000gals to 34,OM gals* Ce k w/Fulala to see
<br /> if he's aware of the i ncrrease. EAM to report back.
<br /> i
<br /> Appointment, John 8lavinski, Title V Variance Hearing, 33, 385 79 Jackbon Road,
<br /> David San i ck i represerrt i ng Cape & Islands
<br /> Anna E. Tanneyh i 11, abbuter present, 1 i v i ng at 39 Jackbon .Rd. All abutters were notified by C&I
<br /> Lots 33&79 will be handled together sine they adjoin.
<br /> Tanneyhill concerned 038, therefore taken first. AT was concerned over the fact that the Assessors map is
<br /> inaccurate, DS -reassured her that the Engineering plans submitted are accurate and the lots are shown not t
<br /> about dackbon Rd AT's house is between 39&40. DS listed the abburtters whos were notified at AT's request.
<br /> C&I asking B -! for variance from local reg requiring 150' separation from well to septic, because of the size
<br /> of lots, second variance is frm sidelin variance-of 10' on the location of reserve pit. This does'not affect
<br /> AT, since it is on the opposite side of her lot. EAM: the sidelin variance is for the reserve area, should the'. -
<br /> primary fail.
<br /> Are ,you satisfied Mrs Tann yh i l l? Do you have'any objections?
<br /> No I don't have any. My quest i oris have been answered and clarified.
<br /> 64tion to approve variance of setback req to 51 on the reserve, second GRC.
<br /> Lots 33&79.; D8: Again the lot sizes cannot accomodate the 150.1ll to septic setback but do cel w/Title V.
<br /> Both wells in front corners and septics at opposite rear comers. On 33 regwesting sideline variance for re-
<br /> serve only. #79 requires active system be placed within 10' of property line, this ist in rear toward"open space".
<br />
|