My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/3/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
2/3/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:22:08 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:50:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/03/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
was very important to term. They were sailors and they appreciated the flora and <br /> fauna around here. They felt that it was very reasonable thing to do. He was a 23- <br /> year <br /> 3-year resident of 1lashpee. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that the system was pretty deep right now the way they had <br /> it. <br /> Ir. Grotzke stated that it allowed therm to place-it properly within the grade. It was <br /> very steep ramp up to the house. Since distance to groundwater was not an issue <br /> he had given therm the go ahead to re-design the system.. The current system was <br /> also a gravity feed system so it was even deeper. It was probably a six-foot pit so it <br /> was a gravity flow from a lower level down. So this aright be even higher than the <br /> last system. <br /> Mr. Gray stated that 15" down was dry peat. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that they had not shown proposed grade for this. They were <br /> showing that existing elevation varied 2 1 , <br /> Mr. Grotzke stated that it did that. If they looked ed t C3 they could see that in the <br /> grading with the different components in the system varied. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that he didn't have elevations on the proposed grades that <br /> was why it was tough to see. <br /> Mr. Gr t 1 e stated that it was C21 and 22. <br /> Mr. Santos asked if these were revised plans. <br /> Mr. Grotzke stated that they were not revised. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that they did not have the same date as Ms. Warder.. <br /> Mr. Gr t l e asked what ones he had. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that he had an April I". The ones he was looking at was <br /> December 1 1h 2004. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that each plan had a different date. <br /> Mr. Grotzke stated that each plan had a different because of the existing conditions <br /> didn't change. <br /> Mr. Santos asked which one they were being asked to approve. <br /> Mr. Grotzke stated that the existing conditions didn't change. He was going t <br /> I. <br /> approve what he had before him. <br /> 1 <br /> 4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.