Laserfiche WebLink
argument was made that the house was built originally with four. He vent out there <br /> and there was four-bedrooms. He was merely stating what was found. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that they could go on the- assumption that if there was no increase in <br /> flow it stated a four-bedroom. It was at four-bedrooms. <br /> Mr. Harrington had another comment. There was a four-foot hallway to get to the <br /> sitting area. It had to be six-foot vide. <br /> Mr. Grotzke stated that it was really just a closet with a little chair.and desk in <br /> there. <br /> Mr. Harrington asked homer big the area was because it may not need...It didn't meet <br /> the size of a bedroom definition. Back to the bedroom issue, he save it as a four- <br /> bedroom. They could re-visit that. The board did not have to go by what he said. <br /> That was what he seen when he was there. There was an argument that it was <br /> originally four. He certainly save-no signs of renovation. Everything looped typical <br /> and original in his opinion. There was a Title v plan on record that shoved it to be <br /> a three-bedroom system. <br /> Mr. Grotzke stated that that was why he felt compelled to revise that would take <br /> advantage of this opportunity to make the system conform to the bedrooms in the <br /> Douse. <br /> Ms. Warden stated that when Title v came irito effect in 2000 and she went t <br /> many DEP meetings. The standard procedure was to go by the old Title v <br /> application. Questions were raised for incidents just life this. Their comments were <br /> that if it were an addition subsequent to the original footprint of the house thea they <br /> would have to tale the bedroom out. If it was built as the douse was built with four <br /> bedrooms. It would be accepted. She was just quoting what Mr. Dudley said during <br /> all those meetings that they went to. If it was built originally with the house then <br /> they could count it as a four bedroom. That was why she asked Mr. Harrington <br /> before Mr. Grotzke cane in if it was an original bedroom plan. Mr. Harrington <br /> stated that it was. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that they were proposing this addition to expand the bedroom size. <br /> It still stays a four bedroom. A bedroom is a bedroom is a bedroom. <br /> Ms. Warden added that they needed to bear in mind that the board had,raver <br /> granted gree the dentrifieation units came into existence they always-required <br /> denitrification units for anything that was under 100' to '. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that after ' they would need the ultra-violet light. So they were <br /> going to reverse this a little. They could stay at three-bedrooms and if they wanted <br /> the fourth bedroom they would have to put a denitrification system in. They could <br /> expand their third bedroom as big as they wanted. That was the only other option. <br /> They could not set a precedent by saying no they were not going to require a <br /> 1 <br />