My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/13/2003 LIBRARY BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
11/13/2003 LIBRARY BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2018 5:02:01 PM
Creation date
4/9/2018 3:19:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
LIBRARY BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/13/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Bu l in-a Site., No charge. <br /> Elevations. fess expensive materials ha- <br /> ve been substituted, without losing good quality. Brick or <br /> simulated store have'replaced the granite. A combination' f brick <br /> with a lowerr-cst matedal right also <br /> be a consideration. A replacement for pre-cast trim around the window's, an eprrrve.item, can be <br /> found. The roofing material has gone from'slate to a halt sf in les ` <br /> ceiling chipboard and ago ustic fife have replaced the � � which shout d fast for� years. Flat . <br /> exposed wood beams. <br /> . udet: The revisedproject budget- <br /> - bud t-has-bei pedused t- $4t-493,_0 from,n -b-,--=-385,000, <br /> FBoo,-w--hi-ch--translatesnto just under$ per �. f. (Seetahert Adormeet Ict eta.ls <br /> Mr. F ober s stated that the modified budget numbers are based inro �ro' <br /> of the revised Wilding fan. �e de � an to the reduction �n the'size <br /> p scribed his revised budgetdinumbers as "responsibly conservative" <br /> indi ting that we may be able to fu�r"ther reduce cost. The bid ' <br /> ng.cfirrate at this time is very favorable <br /> for new building pr jects. The-8% contingency allowance could also tu <br /> than needed. m out to be substantially higher <br /> urestions c r nt for Mr. Roberts <br /> • Dave Burton commented that <br /> we have a unique . <br /> q opportunity to attract generous contributions in <br /> support of cultural center, more so than, say,. a utilitarian facility uch as new#ire or <br /> station. <br /> police <br /> • John Rent asked about the possibility of adding future 1�wrl <br /> ng . Mr. Roberts stated that the plan <br /> will easily accommodate adjustments at a later date. The revised rare is designed <br /> needs of the libraryfor the next 2 ear p fined to meet the <br /> Ed Defoe asked about accommodation for custodial closets. Mr. Roberts will need to pian for <br /> this. <br /> Steve Cook asked about inclusion of energy efl~icienci <br /> - es ds.rgrrd to meet the Ma , code <br /> requirements.ents. r. Roberts stated that passive'solar; for example, does not work well fo <br /> Active solar systems, such a foto voltaic, r libraries. <br /> � , ale droppr�n in costs. <br /> Geothermal heat pumps havemaintenance issues. They cost more but thea ba <br /> � Environmental issues. Use of r cls are good. <br /> recycled aterials is possible, but can drive up costs. Tori O'Neill <br /> commented that some recycled materials could beproblematic. We need to be careful hot to <br /> create problems that count surface 7 to 1 o years down the road. <br /> • Tom O' eill's observations-: the first floor lan seems disorganized and needs further work. The <br /> meeting room needs to_ abler to-accommodate'at_l st-- ,people.-- ccess-to-the-mech ------T <br /> needs t be on.an exterior wall, for gas � � ar��caf <br /> y ass. The lobby now looks constricted, not open. <br /> Tom suggested long windows on the left hard side of the first floor conference room-t <br /> more ligf�t, givinga warmer feelingt � On ' o allow <br /> the room. the I t. 1 1 side of the building, Tom <br /> suggested that Mr. Roberts try to more cfo ely mirror the€runt entrance to the library, s most <br /> people will be entering the building from the back parking area. <br /> Joyce Mason stated that she felt the committee had dome a great job in do nsi r� thecosts and is optfr�iti that with a little project <br /> more tweaking- ,in could be sold to the Board of Selectmen'. <br /> Torn O'Neill aged that it is important to gena significant donor~ SAB which will ' <br /> Selectmen a further comfort leve � 1 give the to accept the revised plan. <br /> TEMPORARY LIBRARY RELOCATION <br /> TorteO'Neill stated that it appears the new Wilting and the existing library do not have the <br /> footpnt. The new structureis situated building, <br /> same <br /> e existing building,which suggests that it might not <br /> be necessary to find a temporary location for'the library. -Construction of the newiuildin mi <br /> - <br /> restricted, the footprint appears to be e $afetyg might e <br /> r close. issues need to be kept in mind. <br /> Bonnie Barrett reminded the committee that the library deed states that"The remises are <br /> suect to restriction for the benefit of the p conveyed <br /> benefited land that until� unless terminated <br /> earlier as he <br /> provided in this paragraph)n building, structure or other improvement <br /> erected, constructed or placed on a ire t shelf be <br /> p Premises-except such as is for use as a public library and <br /> substantially in conformity with the architectural design, materials,floor area and other matt <br /> ars as <br /> shown in plans and specifications which have been submitted to the Grantor-and either a <br /> writing by the grantor or days shah have elapsed ppr�vd in <br /> p d after such submission without receipt by tl' <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.