Laserfiche WebLink
.i • l tr <br /> MEVUTES October 16, 1996 7 BOARD OF HEALTH <br /> time, levels, lix its, etc. "obviously, you can only make your recommendations with the <br /> information that you were providedwith." <br /> FIs. Seger stated, `' s more information continues to be generated in regards to <br /> this we're more then happy to follow-up on it." <br /> Mr. Giatralis stated, "We're-still saying the spy of 1988 is being overlooked." <br /> N1r. harks, resident of the Sampson's Mill Road area, questioned, ""Does P.C.E. <br /> move faster than T.C. .." <br /> l&. Trowbridge responded, "No." "There are very similar in viscosity." <br /> Mr. Marks stated, `This contamination has been going on for many, z any Yew-;I� <br /> "They have never taken soil samples from anywhere other then where the plume is.'" "We <br /> need to know if it has been on someone else's property and moved on." <br /> Mr. Trowbridge stated, 'The D.P.H. is supporting access to municipal water:" <br /> Attorney Scanlon relayed, "Sonne of these people are still drkking water which <br /> may be contaminated." "'If I could provide a copy of a fax sent by Augat to their main <br /> company saying they spilled 49 gallons in 1993 would that change your opinion of hat's <br /> going to happen to the groundwater in the aquifer that on the property south of Route <br /> 2 .1�� <br /> lr. Trowbridge responded, 'No."" "The environmental sample data is not based- <br /> on the 15 gallon spill," "Before we had the environmental data we made some estimates <br /> about the spill.7' "That's all we had." "We did not have data further south, we did not <br /> know the end of the T.C.E. plume." "When we received that new data we used it for the <br /> study." <br /> Attorney Scanlon questioned, "If the residents in aquifer are exposed to an <br /> additional spite in 1993 hat's going to happen to the groundwater <br />