Laserfiche WebLink
-Ax <br /> July- 14, 1984 Page 2 <br /> n. at least by thosepresent) are that funding for <br /> " .Agency 'indications <br /> a Bay iroprovement. project would be highly COm eti ti ire, with early <br /> fund-in chances being verY slim. However, funding applications were <br /> e <br /> n ous ed. (Note: other funding sources than those discussed are <br /> availablej depending on the ,definition" f .the project.) <br /> ' +own's having one agreed gpon approach. The �r� ortan of the h to the • <br /> -Bay <br /> problem was stressed. Additionall f the necessity for involving <br /> Barnstable in the issue was discussed. <br /> e was overall , and a genuine desire to cooperate <br /> �7. 'I've agency response � <br /> w1th the T ns/GpBwA to emo to the review Process (both In the <br /> develo#rent of applications and during the formal review procedures <br /> was obvious. k <br /> 1 <br /> I 1 <br /> I <br /> s <br /> tl3:y r <br /> r <br />.y <br /> a <br /> • <br /> i - <br /> y F y <br /> illi k <br /> 11 i <br /> 4 <br /> Fk1 1 i - <br /> .fr <br /> • <br /> i <br />