09/07/1993 BOARD OF SELECTMEN Minutes

Home Browse Search

For the remaining 20 criteria, Mr. Whritenour earns ratings ranging from 3.2 to 3.8. A rating of 3 is considered acceptable. It should be noted, that for 16 of these 20 criteria, Mr. Whritenour receives a poor or unacceptable rating from one Selectman, while the other 4 • Selectmen rate him as performing at an acceptable level or better. The performance criteria for which Mr. Whritenour earned the highest average ratings are: Resilient Energy and motivation maintained in spite of constant demands; handles stress well. Financial Management Accurately and concisely reports (and projects) the financial condition; management practices and policies are designed to maintain (or achieve) a sound long range financial condition - uses debt cautiously, plans for the long term replacement and maintenance of equipment and infrastructure. Credits Governing Body Credits municipal accomplishments to the policy makers, does not feed personal ego. Ethical Conforms to the high standards of the profession; knowsfollows and promotes the International City Manager's Association Code of Ethics. Hiring Recognizes the value of excellent employees and uses all reasonable efforts to assure the best individuals are recruited and hired. • Relationship with BOS Humor Maintains and shares an appropriate sense of humor to lighten the load. 11 Risk Management Implements effective programs to limit liability and loss The performance criteria for which Mr. Whritenour earned the lowest average ratings are: Follow -Through Organizing Ability to arrange work and efficiently apply resources. Relationships with Elected and Appointed Boards/Committees/Officials Developing Management Techniques Communications with Employees Provides sufficient information to keep employees productive, motivated and part of the team; understands their concerns. Mashpee Board of Selectmen - September 7, 1993 Summary Report - Annual Evaluation of Robert Whritenour