My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/28/2018 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
6/28/2018 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2019 2:41:51 PM
Creation date
8/3/2018 10:05:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/28/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
matter further. Mr. Fudala pointed out that the condition was intended to allow developers to move <br /> forward with,their projects. Referencing the amount of C-1 Zoning, Mr. Fudala noted that the intent <br /> was to address density in the center of Town and confirmed that one square foot would be acceptable. <br /> In SubSection H.(14),Mr. Fudala recommended removing C-2. Mr. Fudala stated that the proposed <br /> Zoning Article had been drafted, following many years of working with Mashpee Commons and in <br /> support of the work of Mr. Chace, while incorporating Form-Based Code,which would guarantee the <br /> appearance of Mashpee Commons development. The Form-Based Code would be offered as a <br /> condition once a Special Permit was granted. Every potential developer purchasing a piece of <br /> Mashpee Commons would be required to fulfill the requirements of the Special Permit. Mr. Fudala <br /> added that there would still be flexibility to make adjustments if necessary. Mr. Fudala expressed his <br /> appreciation for Mr. Chace and Mashpee Commons, adding that the proposed Article would be the <br /> simplest and quickest way to support Mashpee Commons in a proper legal approach. <br /> Mr. Kooharian echoed Mr. Fudala's thoughts about Mashpee Commons,who had done a remarkable <br /> job planning their development. Mr. Kooharian stated that the Planning Board wanted to help and <br /> remain engaged to address the Town's needs. Mr. Kooharian agreed that it would be important to <br /> maintain the flexibility of signage for Mashpee Commons and emphasized that the Board was not <br /> against the efforts of Mashpee Commons and wanted the project to move forward and be a good <br /> project for the Town. <br /> The Chair described the changes to the Article to include: <br /> -page 1/MPD-Mr. Rowley had recommended defining the portion, even down to the square <br /> inch, based on his previous experience that it could become a source of contention later if there was no <br /> discussion. Although recommended to include a minimum square footage, there was consensus by the <br /> Planning Board to maintain the wording that any portion within C-1 was acceptable, recognizing that it <br /> could be down to the square inch,provided that it was within C-1. <br /> Mr. Rowley added that he respected Mr. Fudala's opinion and agreed that this should be included in a <br /> Zoning Bylaw as a potential option. Mr. Rowley stated that, for two years, 2005-2007, the ZBA <br /> considered a Comprehensive Special Permit for Mashpee Commons,with accompanying documents <br /> that included the basis for Form-Based Code and adopted as part of the Special Permit. Mr. Rowley <br /> expressed concern about language in the Mashpee Commons' recent Form-Based Code proposal that <br /> required "all Departments, Boards and Authorities of the Town of Mashpee must comply with the <br /> procedural requirements of the Ordinance."Mr. Rowley suggested it would be the Town, through <br /> Town Meeting vote, establishing the authority and procedural requirements;including the Master Plan. <br /> Mr. Rowley agreed that Mashpee Commons was a good steward and good neighbor to Mashpee and <br /> felt that something could be done to benefit the Town as a whole. <br /> -page 1/Add new subsection H.(14), removing"C-2"for which there was consensus <br /> -page3/Section C-change occupancy permit to building permit for which there was consensus <br /> -page 6/Section N-there had been discussion about removing the section but there was <br /> consensus to maintain Section N as is <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.