Laserfiche WebLink
to the Town, it required a procedure. The Chair stated that the process was already in place, Ms. <br /> Farr responded that it was an ordinance to work for the entirety of the project area land <br /> conveyance could be removed if they look at the existing language. 'Mr. Rowley' recommended <br /> that they return to the existing language. Mr. L'ehrer- stated that he!was listening to the Board and <br /> inquired whether'the :would b e ani-enable to him going through line b line and coordinating <br /> with Mashpee Commons. The Chair asked that lir. Lehrer support the Planing Board's <br /> P <br /> roposed B law,to which Mr. Lehrer responded that he could not, The Chair responded that she <br /> would not assign work that would work'against the Planning Board, Mr. B al zari ni stated <br /> that the were at ah ins assn and the Chair stated that more time was needed. <br /> � p <br /> The Chair invited the public to comment. <br /> Mr, Marsters was again recogni2ed and reiterated that the Buil ding Inspector was not a planning <br /> person, but that he was an enforcement officer. 11 r, MArsters added that he agreed that <br /> di cus si on regarding site 'improvement in reference to the FB seemed ambig' u'ous. 1 Ir, Rowley <br /> noted that otentialapplicants would likely interp ret documents their own way unless they Were <br /> p <br /> very specific. Ms. Wilbur inquired whether the Building Inspector approved indivi dual buildings <br /> on l ots and the Chair responded that some projects Were by 171"171"ght but others were reviewed b <br /> Committee or Board. Mr. Bal ari ni stated that'the Planning Board nevi ewed Subdivisions but the <br /> Building- Inspector enforced there. Ills. Wilbur suggested they would life to identify the proper <br /> threshold to allow 'oversight by the Building Inspector and the Chair responded that they could <br /> review their Bylaw. The Chair added that the Planning Board had been fair to property owners <br /> who met with the Board and as citizen planners, allowed for public comment to wei h in on' <br /> prof ects, Ills.Farr inquired whether she would need to meet with the Planning Board to add a <br /> 250 square foot addition to a commercial property and Mr. Lehrer responded that anything under <br /> a Special Permit would go to the Planning Board, likely requesting a modification, <br /> Ms. Wilbur as'ke'd if anyone wi shed to sham specific questions or comments. 11 r. Balzarini <br /> responded that they should reconsider the Building Inspector. Ms. Farr suggested considering a <br /> different tier approval process so that not everything would be reviewed by the Planning Board. <br /> The h'ai.r suggested sharing what was"'b right' currently in the Zoning Bylaw. The Chair <br /> indicated that she had requested i nfornnati on from. Mashpee Commons by email to Mussell - <br /> Preston, Mr. Balzarini stated that the Planning Board had expressed their thoughts and suggested <br /> Mashpee Commons return with their-proposal. Ms, Farr responded that she recommended a <br /> three person staff review of Projects which she had been involved Frith in her previous planning <br /> experience when they incorporated FB 1 n Yarmouth, Maine, comprised of a Town Eng'i neer <br /> Public'works, Building Inspector,Police and Fire Chief <br /> A breakas taken at 9:13 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 9:21 p.m.- <br /> Massachusetts <br /> .m.-lassaehusetts General Law CH 40A,Mashpee Town Bylaw & Masbpee Town <br /> h arter-The harter was distributed to Planning Board members. Chairman waygan reported <br /> that she had drafted a memo to the Board of Selectmen requesting support for a consultant for <br /> the Planning Board, which also included a request to move MashpeeCommons' FBC to another <br /> meeting, The Chair will have the draft memo added to the-meeting packet for next time to be <br /> considered by Planning Board members, <br /> 10 <br /> r <br />