Laserfiche WebLink
the registry of Deeds which was approved by the Planning Board as a principal means of access <br /> to abutting-property. <br /> The Chair inquired whether the parcel was a gandfathered property and Nor. Rowley referenced <br /> the last sentence of 1'74.3, noting that the Planning Board in 1978 somehow determined that the <br /> road was-adequate to service-the Douses. Ms. Nfarwili pointed out that the property had already <br /> been divided into two lots in 1978. Ms. Marcelli also noted that a home was located further <br /> down the road where it was narrower. Mr. Rowley indicated that he had provided photographs <br /> of the road and noted that if a building was constructed, it would require that it be cut into the <br /> bank. Mr. Rowley indicated that the concern requiring deliberation from the Planning Board was <br /> determining whether the road would provide reasonable use for the property, from Jones Road to <br /> the lot in question. Mr. .Rud. la.stated that the only issue that the Board could consider was the <br /> frontage. <br /> Mr. Bal arim suggested that the road was adequate for the rot regarding access. Mr. Cummings <br /> reported that he visited the road last week and noted that, prior to the property, he had to stop <br /> because a true lamer than a fire truck needed to pass his car. Mr. Cummings stated his belief <br /> that the road was adequate. IVIS. waygan inquired whether the Fire Deparunent had-reviewed the <br /> issue. Chief Rullo was asked to deliver a letter to provide a variance on.the bylaw, which he <br /> stated he would not do. Chief Rullo indicated that Ms. lli's property was within 500 feet <br /> of a fire hydrant, though he did express concern regarding the width of the road. Mr. Fudala <br /> pointed out that a variance would be sought from the SBA from the Fire Access Bylaw. Mr. <br /> Koharian suggested that large trucks had accessed the properties and indicated that he was <br /> comfortable with approving the road. Mr. Fudala coed that there were 4 homes beyond the <br /> property. Mr. Rowley coed that it was a passable gavel nuface.that appeared not,to get <br /> rutted and featuring sufficient drainage with no steep grade. <br /> MOTION: Ms. watygan stated than given when the lot was created, it was a buildable lot <br /> and that it does not have a lot of traffic as a dead end dirt road then she would make a <br /> motion that it has adequate access. Nor. 'ul seconded the motion. AU voted <br /> unanimously. <br /> SPELL PERAUTS <br /> Applicant: Southport on Cape Cod <br /> Location: Southport Phase III buildings 1 , 14, 15, 16 and 4 <br /> Request: Approval of proposed trueearing <br /> Mr. hudala described the tree clearing guidelines for Southport and the identification process for <br /> selecting trees to be saved. Mr. FudWa indicated that the tree walk for Buildings 13, 1-4, 15, 1 <br /> and 47 yielded no trees-to be saved. The Chair inquired whether replacement trees would be <br /> planted and Mr. Fudala confirmed that they would, noting that Mr. Bonvie had just planted 4" <br /> trees at the development. Mr. Rina had recommended thaatMr. Bonvie submit the replanting <br /> process by letter for finwe reference. Jay Z rell , rep g Southport on bell f Mr. <br /> Bonvie., noted that a 100 foot buffer would be located behind the homes. <br /> Board members reviewed the plan. r. Rowley poi <br /> linted out the steep slope and depth of <br /> foundations and necessary regnuFmg that would require the removal of trees. Ms. wa gan <br />