Laserfiche WebLink
-in close proximity of Sarituit Pond Road. Mr. Fudala emphasi ed that,t a street name presented <br /> a dispatch/communication public safety concern. <br /> Ms. Jackman inquired whether the road could be changed to Santuit Pond Way while continuing <br /> to use.35 Santuit Pond Road as an address. Mr. Fudala responded that the Planning Board was <br /> not responsible for addressing. IVIS. waygan referenced Mr. Nicholson's letter which stated that <br /> the""Parcel would be given a 35 Santuit Pond way address." 1r.Fudala stated that the only role <br /> of the Planning Board was to change the street name. <br /> The Chair inquired about the opinions of the Planning Board members, three of whom would <br /> support renaming.Beechwood Point Drive to Santuit Pond way. Chairman Petersen inquired <br /> whether the residents would support selecting a future date in order for the change to be in of W. <br /> Mr. Putnam responded with a date at the beginning of the next year. Ms. Waygan stated that the <br /> residents shouid have time to confirm their address with the Address working Group, since they <br /> wished to use 3 5 Santuit Pond Road as their address, The Chair recommended speaking also <br /> with residents who did not respond to the latest surrey, Mr. Fudala stated that Mr. Mayo <br /> requested an effective a date of 4 weeks from the Planning Board's vote. Mr. Fudala added that all <br /> utilities would be notified by the Town- There was discussion about continuing the-hearing. Mr. <br /> Bal afim* stated that the P1 ng Board was responsible for changing the street name and the <br /> address had to be discussed with Mr. Nicholson. Mr. Balarini wished to respond to the <br /> concerns expressed by the Address working Group and nested to take the vote. 11ris. waygan <br /> requested that the vote be delayed until the residents spoke with Mr. Nicholson. Mr. Putnam <br /> agreed about the need to remove Beechwood Point Drive but expressed interest in discussing <br /> with Mr. Nicholson the possibility of 'ni.ng the 35 Santuit Pond Road address. <br /> MOTION: Mr. Bal arini made a motion to change the street from Beechwood Paint Drive <br /> to Santuit Pond Way.lir. Cummings seconded the motion. <br /> Ms. +vaygan requested that the Board postpone the vote to allow the residents to speak with Mr. <br /> Nicholson. The Chair did not see that a conversation with Mr. Nicholson would change the vote <br /> for the Board. Mr. Puftiam reported that Mr. Nicholson confirmed that the compromise would he <br /> 5 Santuit Pond Way. Mr. Cummings referenced Mr. Nicholson's letter requesting the Planning <br /> Board's"approval of the street name of Santuit Pond way." The Chair asked for the vote. <br /> Alan wake, 34D, recognized that the change was due to the potential of something happening, <br /> but suggested that there was no foundation for the confusion. Mr. wake added that the CAD <br /> system should alloy the input of any necessary information to clarify the location. <br /> The Chair responded that the Address working Group requested the need to change Beechwood <br /> Point give to Santuit Pond way. lir. ' minded his motion as it was necessary to first <br /> close the hearing. The Char emphasized than the responsi <br /> enc <br /> g pbility of the Planning Board was to <br /> eliminate Beechwood Point Drive in order to comply with the Address working Group. <br /> Mr. wake suggested that there could be numerous discrepanci <br /> Mr. es and the change would be <br /> needed a postal address change a l well, r. wake wished to maintain the 35 Santuit Pond <br /> Road address and questioned how dispatch could nye a rare. The Cquestioned <br />