Laserfiche WebLink
Massachusetts Estuary Project(MEP) <br /> Linked Watershed Emba ment Model Peer Review <br /> important to understand that the MEP models do not directly predict eelgrass recovery or any measure of <br /> uncertainty in eelgrass recovery. The models only predict the concentrations of nitrogen in the water <br /> column. Application of the models to eelgrass recovery assumes that the thresholds determined by the <br /> MEP process Iare supportive for eelgrass. Below,the Panel discusses both the strengths and weaknesses <br /> associated with this process of model application and nitrogen thresholds. <br /> Key Issue 2-Sentinel Station Protocol by which the Absolute Nitrogen Threshold is Determined <br /> The protocol MEP uses to establish the nitrogen threshold for eelgrass in an embayment is based on <br /> developing a direct correspondence between the nitrogen concentrations(either total or bioactive, <br /> depending on the embayment)and eelgrass condition at one or more sentinel stations. Using this <br /> approach it is assumed that: 1)the status of eelgrass at the sentinel station represents a"healthy <br /> functioning eelgrass condition,2)eelgrass is in an equilibrium state at the sen i e, station;and 3)the <br /> nitrogen concentration'observed at that station is the most significant factor,affecting eelgrass status. The <br /> underlying strength to this approach is that it is based on data;there are direct measurements of nitrogen <br /> concentrations and observations of the correspondence of nitrogen with-eelgrass condition. Additional <br /> confidence in this approach- gained by studies in eelgrass systems#hat corroborate a'similar relationship <br /> in the correspondence between nitrogen and eelgrass condition:- Further support for this approach is <br /> attained by using more than one data set to evaluate the status of eelgrass condition,including MEP's <br /> evaluation and interpretation of eelgrass mapping data provided by the MDEP and field surveys <br /> conducted by the MEP team. <br /> Uncertainties arise from potential weaknesses in the basic assumptions of the correspondence approach. <br /> Scientific consensus indicates that a healthy eelgrass ecosystem has a very'significant influence on the <br /> local environment with many positive feedbacks that affect;biophysical processes and support eelgrass <br /> growth and survival,including•parameters such as nutrient cycling and storage,sediment stabilization, <br /> optical water quality and biological oxygen demand(Moore,2004,Moore et al. 1996,Havens et al.2001, <br /> Homer and Bondgaard,2001,Carr et al.2010,van der Heide 2011). If it is assumed that the sentinel <br /> station is a healthy functioning eelgrass system,the environmental conditions at that station would be <br /> affected by the presence of eelgrass and the nitrogen concentrations at the sentinel site will reflect this. In <br /> the transition from impaired to unimpaired state where eelgrass is sparse or absent,the positive feedbacks <br /> will not be functioning and nitrogen delivered to the system will be available for other primary'producers <br /> .to utilize. Empirical and modeling-studies demonstrate'that eutrophication in southeastern Massachusetts <br /> is derived mostly from a combination of nitrogen enhanced chlorophyll abundance in the water column <br /> and excessive macroalgal growth(Valiela e.t al. 1997b,Hauxwell et al.2001). The MEP program has not <br /> specifically identified nitrogen threshold values for either of these two components,so it is not possible to <br /> predictif the threshold concentrations would limit these primary producers from outcompeting eelgrass <br /> (Pedersen and Borum 1996,Mcdlathry et al.2007). <br /> The threshold approach assumes that the transition from impaired to unimpaired conditions will'operate '. <br /> as a simple switch when nitrogen reaches a specified threshold concentration. This approach <br /> Oversimplifies the complex process,of eutrophication that results in the impairment of several ecosystem <br /> functions and changes in the bio-physical properties of the sediment. The positive feedbacks associated <br /> with sustaining a healthy eelgrass state;presumably present where the threshold value is determined(e.g, <br /> _:La• <br /> it <br /> riai.e.i ciar.ity,•nutlient storage,oxygen production),'.are not'.present'.is,-the.impair eo.conalLion.'.�i'�i 09.—n � <br /> now interacting with other potential stress factors.'Many of the most impaired enib ynien-s"have changed <br /> state,ll#avens et al.20,01,van der Heide et al.201 1,Carr et al.''20"W,Fonseca,2u 1 1 j.and these other <br /> .lift vxitiai-.,ttcSafat,taars. t'ri7Lit,a:,water<utaS;atd.:,susca..ftuo€i'..-,t, iiiicncs,.Gi„i <br /> av ei. rS blb ;7 r feugicssc v a D fn <br /> recovery (Uoodiiiaii et ai. 1993,Moore et al. l99%/S',emp et al.LUfJ4t,Wazniak et a1.2-00 f,tialfegos eta]. <br /> o ae111V l..a ixud ceig ass resTvi[x,wn_goals tho pi—Zits aiii aiss h.wie to e:zp d adiuss <br /> epth grarli nf`-into deeper waterwhere liglit availability W-111'become a ctiticAly signiiis.__it factor. <br /> Deceniber 30,2011 —� <br />