My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/29/2011 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
>
3/29/2011 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 1:14:00 PM
Creation date
1/2/2019 1:50:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SEWER COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/29/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
suspended particles are altered to increase disposed of or regenerated either on-or off- <br /> their agglomeration, creating larger flocs,which site. Purchase of GAC can be costly, and GAC <br /> are more readily separated from solution by disposal may be difficult, particularly if the <br /> sedimentation and/or filtration. In drinking spent GAC is considered a hazardous waste <br /> water applications, chemical coagulants such as (McGuire et al, 1989). <br /> aluminum sulfate(alum),ferric chloride,and <br /> ferric or ferrous sulfate are typically added to Membrane Filtration <br /> increase floc formation, increasing <br /> sedimentation rates.This process can be used Membrane processes can remove TOC through <br /> to remove particulate carbon; in addition, filtration and adsorption. Organic molecules <br /> some coagulants react with dissolved organics, <br /> rendering them insoluble. greater in size than the membrane pores are <br /> rejected based on size exclusion. Membranes <br /> In drinking water applications,TOC removal is may also remove TOC through surface <br /> routinely increased through enhanced adsorption, though this mechanism is <br /> coagulation, in which chemical coagulants are undesirable as it has been shown to cause <br /> optimized for organics removal (U.S. irreversible fouling. Microfiltration (MF) and <br /> Environmental Protection Agency, 1999). ultrafiltration (UF) have shown limited efficacy <br /> in TOC removal due to their relatively large <br /> Figure 1 'presents a typical coagulation, <br /> pore size. <br /> flocculation, and sedimentation process. <br /> Coagulant <br /> SEDIMENTATION <br /> BASIN <br /> Treated " o <br /> E <br /> Wastewater - <br /> Effluent <br /> RAPID MIX FLOCCULATION FILTERS <br /> BASIN <br /> Figure 1. Typical Coagulation, Flocculation,Sedimentation Process <br /> Adsorption <br /> Activated carbon may be used to adsorb Treated <br /> soluble organics, including carbon and nitrogen <br /> Wastewater— <br /> compounds. Granular activated carbon (GAC) Effluent <br /> is a well-tested approach for TOC removal, <br /> traditionally used in drinking water <br /> applications. GAC can be used in either a <br /> down-flow or an upflow contactor. GAC GAC <br /> systems typically require pretreatment(such as CONTACTOR <br /> coagulation,filtration, or softening)to prevent <br /> filter clogging. Figure 2 presents a typical GAC Figure 2. Typical GAC Process <br /> adsorption process. <br /> The-GAC adsorption-effectiveness decreases Both reverse osmosis (RO)and nanofiitration <br /> over time, with effluent TOC concentrations (NF) membranes are effective at reducing TOC <br /> increasing over time. Once the effluent concentrations. In addition to TOC, both RO <br /> concentration has reached a threshold limit, and NF membranes reject most contaminants, <br /> the GAC column must be taken offline to allow though precise rejection fractions vary by <br /> the GAC to be replaced. Spent GAC may be membrane manufacturer. However, RO <br /> membranes are typically more effective at <br /> The NEWEA Journal Winter 2010 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.