Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Barer said #17 should be based on a pro rata share. <br /> Torn said he added the last sentence to #17 because of M r. Bakers' comments <br /> last fall , <br /> Ed said he recognized the charge and appreciates it but it doesn ' t really <br /> say what he means. <br /> Tom said he agrees with most of what M r. Baker has said but that level of <br /> specificity i s premature for this part of the O l an. <br /> M r. Babcock has two suggestions: the term tertiary sewage treatment is not <br /> used, advanced waste water treatment is correct. He also suggested using <br /> metric <br /> Torn suggested wording change for G: , . . that would cause levels in public <br /> water supply wells that exceed state and Federal guidelines, change last <br /> sentence, . .any other state and Federal standards from being met. <br /> M r. Babcock agreed it is an improvement. However, Massachusetts is a r <br /> Commonwealth not a state . <br /> (Tony Ferragamo left the meeting at this time) <br /> Nancy caffyn suggested the hearing should be closed at this point, because <br /> the Board lost their quorum. <br /> Tots explained the hearing is not required by any statute, there is no legal <br /> reason for the hearing ,. The discussion can continue informally and the <br /> -Formal hearing can be continued at a later date. <br /> All suggestions tonight will be incorporated . <br /> Deidre thinks policy #4 is putting the burden on the applicant coming <br /> before the town, that i s hot where the burden should be . The Town should <br /> determine what size structure can go on what size l of,, That is incumbent on <br /> the regulatory agency. <br /> Ton said th-is has been in our zoning bylaws for 7 years . Any development <br /> over 5 lots has to do a water quality report, It is not a new item. <br /> De i d re suggested the wording be changed to recognize that. <br /> Tom explained the goals , objectives and policies cover all issues, even if <br /> we are dealing with them now. If we only put in new pieces in you loose <br /> half of i t. <br /> #4 is the means to achieve #1 t <br /> dei dre u bested dei et i n , from #4, recommended by local permitting <br /> agencies. <br /> Tom agreed it should be deleted . . <br /> Nancy c aff n stated ,i n policy i cy #�5 i n some eases you look for containment (of <br /> y •' � at <br /> plumes) w`��th eventual clean up but containment i s how we' re operating i n <br /> this point. <br /> Tom will add containment. <br /> Tom cambe rar i suggested the town adopt the performance standard aquifer <br /> classification system. He asks that Mashpee take another look at the <br /> classification system and how it could be useful to the town . <br /> Tom thinks that discussion will be useful at the next level of the plan <br /> Bill Hauck asked Tori cambe ra r i if the Commission looks at the town as a <br /> 4 <br />