Laserfiche WebLink
` <br /> Mashpee Pl ann ing Board -3- 8/1("'o/95 <br /> Another ioosue Mr . �of fey sa�d was that the property the app1 J.(9: n <br /> propm�es to subdivide is marked opem ��ace for anmther <br /> c-Ievelopment and he' s mot sure if it an be deve1o1--)ed. Mr . Fudala <br /> sa"td 1f they subdivide the dt--�veIopment <br /> which it was par-t' of wil1 not be buildable as the cluster <br /> development could omly be created with the open space. Chairman <br /> Ferragamo agreed that the specia1 permit for the cluster <br /> development was granted with t pen sp�-.tce and th�At s1-3e� iLA. <br /> permit wcmld have to bp amended. Mr . Fudala said the special <br /> permit decision requires the open space be kept by the <br /> homeowmer ' � as�ociation or deeded to the town, but 1t doesn' t <br /> provide for further subdividing. <br /> The Eioard reviewed the report from the in which <br /> t[iey recmmmended they use town water . They said they approve of <br /> �he lot� but the issue o� subdivid�ng open space has to be . <br /> reeolved by the Planning Board. P1anning Board membmrs said they � <br /> would have to get furthercIarific�tion from the Board of Health � <br /> reI at ive to l c/ts 5-8 as it wasn' t c 1 ear in the report i f thay | <br /> approved of them as Mr . Fudala said there' s a letter regarding a | <br /> taking by eminent dcvmain by the Water DVstrict of th� property <br /> within 400' of the Ho1land wel1 radius. | <br /> The Board reviewed the Consulting repmrt . In his � <br /> rorhe t askef <br /> d or the definiticm f oGreat Hay RdM <br /> . r <br /> ep . !. <br /> Sl avinsky said r imeter 1-31an was done and that shows the � <br /> definition. He said Great Hay Rddoesn' t touch the travelled ! <br /> way. Chairm�n FerrZ-A.g�AmCA asked if there' s no layout of Great Hay ! <br /> Rd. , what rights di the applicant have to reat Hay Rd. and the � <br /> ability tm t with it . Mr . Slavinis k said based on the faot i <br /> that Gr**at is recorded it ' � caI led a publ i� road. � <br /> Other requests made by Mr . Rcw1ey in his report were to clarify <br /> the square footag� of easement areas, why the cu1-de-sac is be�ng | <br /> lefton the plan, note existing draimage structures on the plan � <br /> that will be removed, change Iocation of leachint..j pit at cul-de- <br /> saconstruction detail for manhole on Taurus Rd. , and s�ow how <br /> Taurus Rd. and 8reat Hay Rd. wi 1 l match up in q i."ade+ and <br /> topography. <br /> Concerns brought up by Mr . Kuchi11ski were diminished �ight | <br /> distance* between stat ions 4 & 6, and runof f from Taurus Rd. going ' <br /> onto Gre�� Hay Rd. <br /> The Board rev1ewed a memo frmm Mr . Smith summarizing tfe Water | <br /> Qua11ty �eport in which he the plan me-_ets Mhe i-p-tandard�. <br /> Mr . Fudala had with the 1.3ui1ding setbak 11.1")es and the | <br /> w i dt h at t�e* st r eet l i ne. . <br /> ! <br /> Ch��irman Ferrag�mo sa1d a report was receieved from Tmwn Counsel | <br /> and it ' s ambiguous a e wmuld rathei- have fuY'ther clar l ficat ion � <br />