Laserfiche WebLink
the basin configuration and circulation in the middle to upper portions of the Quashnet River <br /> support lower salinities than the larger lower basin, nearest the tidal inlet. Brackish salinities <br /> within this upper basin have been observed in past years,but in recent years,a freshening <br /> appeared to be occurring that did not continue into the drought year of 2016. Upon return to <br /> average annual rainfall conditions, if this basin further freshens, phosphorus management may <br /> need to be evaluated(Figure 18). The Mashpee River upper basin also supports brackish <br /> salinities (3-5 ppt) similar to the upper Quashnet River Basin. However, the Mashpee River <br /> has supported a stable salinity structure for many years and no tidal restrictions are found <br /> within the tidal river itself. <br /> In contrast to these riverine habitats,the larger more open basins within both Waquoit and <br /> Popponesset Bay Systems generally show only small salinity gradients and little variation in <br /> average salinities from year to year. This pattern results from their larger volumes, <br /> proportionally lower freshwater inflow rates and closer proximity to the lower nitrogen,higher <br /> salinity waters of Nantucket Sound, especially the lower main basins of Popponesset Bay, <br /> Waquoit Bay and Eel Pond. The generally high salinities(-25-30 ppt) of these major basins is <br /> typical of the shallow enclosed estuaries of southeastern Massachusetts where major rivers are <br /> generally absent and tidal volumes are large relative to freshwater discharges. <br /> Monitoring results from summers 2010-2016, show that total nitrogen levels throughout the <br /> Waquoit Bay and Popponesset Bay Systems are significantly enriched over the high quality <br /> waters of Nantucket Sound(0.28 mg/1-TN) entering during flooding tides and are generally <br /> consistent with prior historical data (Figure 7 and 11). The pattern of nitrogen gradients in both <br /> systems roughly follows the salinity gradients, as the major source of the "excess"nitrogen is <br /> from groundwater and surface freshwater inflows. Within each sub-embayment, nitrogen levels <br /> were highest within the headwaters and declined with decreasing distance from the tidal inlets, <br /> with the lowest nitrogen levels being recorded at the stations proximate to each inlet. In both <br /> systems there are inter-annual differences,probably the result of inter-annual variation in <br /> weather related factors (wind,rain,temperature, etc.) or small differences in the sampling. For <br /> example, based on the 2010-2012 and 2016 TN averages, there is a very high average TN value <br /> at the head of the Quashnet River, much higher than in the long-terra historical data or the 2013- <br /> 2015 average results (Figure 7). The higher TN years are caused by elevated PON levels <br /> associated with major phytoplarikton blooms. The observed inter-annual variability results from <br /> the higher average PON (total chlorophyll a)and TN values for the 2010-12 and 2016 seasons. <br /> These"peaks"in TN were not repeated in 2013, 2014, 2015 or 2016. The cause of the blooms is <br /> a combination of temperature, sunlight and circulation which allows a bloom to develop, <br /> possibly related to elevated inorganic nitrogen inputs in strearnflows. The variation itself <br /> indicates the need to establish a long-term baseline to be able to demonstrate changes in water and <br /> habitat quality related to changes in nitrogen loading versus inter-annual variations related to <br /> circulation and weather. <br /> In general, the 2010-2016 sampling results are consistent with the prior years in showing that <br /> these tributary basins are still well above their assimilative capacity with total nitrogen levels <br /> well above their TMDL designated threshold. The threshold total nitrogen level for these basins <br /> varies from 0.5 mg L' for Quashnet to restore bottom animal habitat to 0.38 mg L' for Hamblin <br /> and Jehu Ponds to re-establish eelgrass habitat (Figure 7). It should be noted that Hamblin and <br /> Jehu Pond only recently lost their eelgrass habitat and therefore may be able to be restored more <br /> quickly than other larger basins that are much farther beyond their acceptable nitrogen <br /> 16 <br />