My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/06/2019 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
02/06/2019 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2019 5:00:18 PM
Creation date
3/13/2019 12:34:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/06/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The back lot would be subdivided as a cluster subdivision to create three buildable lots and two open <br /> space parcels. In order to create the parcels,the existing ancient way must be brought up to current <br /> road standards with the Town, creating a road layout that would include a T turnaround. The <br /> preliminary application was intended to seek review of the project with Mr. Rowley. <br /> Chairman Waygan inquired about the abutting Town open space, which Mr. Lizardi-Rivera located on <br /> the map. Mr. Rowley confirmed that there were 45 days from submittal to approve the general concept <br /> of the design, deny it or make recommendations, and then an additional 90 days for the Definitive <br /> Plan. Mr. Rowley would provide comments after reviewing the plan and confirmed that this plan was <br /> different from what was previously submitted. Chief Rullo and Mr. Rowley inspected the entrance of <br /> Meetinghouse Road previously and expressed concern about the grade of the hill, as well as trees and <br /> utility poles. Rules and regulations required a turnaround up to 800 feet but a determination by the <br /> Board, and Fire Department, would be necessary to determine if the T turnaround would be sufficient. <br /> Likewise, consideration was necessary regarding the hardened surface and access. <br /> Mr. Balzarini inquired about the width and Mr. Rowley confirmed that it was presently narrow. The <br /> plan did not accurately represent the existing conditions. The Chair inquired about the driveway <br /> crossing open space. Matt Costa, Cape and Islands Engineering, responded that there was plenty of <br /> open space available so there was no need to count to count the driveway portion toward open space, <br /> adding that the plan was to improve the ancient way. The Chair stated that there could be difficulty <br /> with deed restricting a portion with cars traveling over open space,but Mr. Costa agreed to address the <br /> issue. Mr. Rowley was authorized to review the plan and the matter would be addressed at the next <br /> meeting. The Chair recommended that the project proponent also consult with the Fire Department. <br /> Since the matter was not a Public Hearing, the Chair could not accept public comment, but invited <br /> anyone interested to submit their comments by letter to Mr. Lehrer. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> C. Rowley Invoice,January 2019-Mr. Lehrer reported that an invoice in the amount of$640 <br /> was received from Charles Rowley for services rendered for the month of January. <br /> MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion to approve payment to Mr. Rowley for $640. Mr. <br /> Cummings seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. <br /> Endorse Official Copy of the Mashpee Zoning Map Amended October 15,2018-Mr. <br /> Lehrer explained that the change was the addition of the Light Industrial Overlay District. Planning <br /> Board members signed the maps. <br /> Discussion on Zoning and Housing Development Strategies-Mr. Lehrer wished to discuss <br /> strategies to increase the housing supply in Mashpee. Mr. Lehrer referenced the Use Table and the 20 <br /> acre minimum required to develop housing. Mr. Lehrer wished to consider a lower threshold, which <br /> could incentivize the development of the housing supply. <br /> The Chair referenced the joint meeting with the Board of Selectmen which suggested any additional <br /> development would need to be net zero. In order to offer net zero, developments would need to <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.