My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/13/2019 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA Decision
>
03/13/2019 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2019 5:00:41 PM
Creation date
3/29/2019 2:15:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
ZBA Decision
Meeting Date
03/13/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br /> Frank Thomas and Kristina Thomas <br /> 123 Shore Drive (Map 117 Parcel 262) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> SP-2019-16 <br /> The existing plan shows the setbacks on Kim Path at 19.2 ft. The engineer provided <br /> a revised plan showing the proposed distance from Kim Path to the structure being 19.7 ft.. <br /> which is better than the 19.2 ft. that currently exists. The Board knows the bylaw was <br /> adopted as Section 174-17.1 and provides for allowance of a raze and replace project upon <br /> a grant of a Special Permit relief which the Board must find that the proposed <br /> reconstruction of a new dwelling will not be substantially more detrimental to the <br /> neighborhood than what currently exists. The construction of a new dwelling will be a <br /> substantial improvement than what currently exists. The new dwelling will obviously have <br /> to conform to current day building codes, and will be a significant increase in value as <br /> compared to the value that's on the existing structure. <br /> In addition, the proposed plan calls for a semi-circular drive along Kim Path, and <br /> is more than adequate to provide the required two parking spaces that are required under <br /> the bylaw for residential use, and there's adequate room along the westerly side of the <br /> structure for additional parking if needed. The lot coverage is increasing because the . <br /> building is larger from the existing 14.3%to 24.6%,but will still be within the 25%allowed <br /> in the Popponesset Overlay District. <br /> Mr. Furbush asked if there is a garage underneath. Attorney Kirrane said that it is <br /> just storage space. The homeowner said; its storage space. <br /> Mr. Furbush asked if there will be any more new non-conformities. Attorney <br /> Kirrane said no; eliminating one of the non-conformities and improving the other slightly. <br /> Sharon read the Board of Health comments into the record. Jonathan read the <br /> Conservation and Inspection Department comments into the record. Jonathan continued <br /> with the Inspection Department comment noting that if the proposed wall is high enough, <br /> it may require a guard to be installed along the entire wall. Mr. Goldstein said if the wall <br /> gets above four ft., it will need protection of a railing or bushes; something for fall <br /> protection. <br /> SPECIAL PERMIT CRITERIA: <br /> ARTICLE V-Nonconforming Buildings and Uses <br /> §174-17.1 Raze and Replace History: Added 10-15-2018 ATM, Article 16, <br /> approved by Attorney General 1-9-2019. <br /> No pre-existing, non-conforming single or two (2) family dwelling structures <br /> shall be torn down and rebuilt on any lot unless there is an issuance of a Special Permit <br /> from the Zoning Board of Appeals. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.