Laserfiche WebLink
13 <br /> Affordable Housing Trust <br /> Minutes <br /> May 20:, 2 1 <br /> ....................... <br /> Present: <br /> Selectman Carol A. Sherman, Selectman John J. Cahalane, Selectman Andrew R. Gottlieu <br /> Selectman Thomas F. ffHara, Selectman John J. Cotton <br /> Allan Isbitz—Affordable Housing Committee <br /> Richard Halpern—Mashp,ee Housing Authority <br /> Mike Richardson—Finance Committee <br /> Absent: <br /> Patrice imental—EDIC <br /> Attendees <br /> Town Manager Rodney C. Collins <br /> Assistant Town Manager Wayne E. Taylor <br /> Town Planner Evan R. Lehrer <br /> Meeting Called to Order by Chairman Sherman at 7:14 p.m. <br /> Mashpee Town Hall, Waquol't Meeting Room <br /> Joint " Teeth a withAhe Affordable Housihst: <br /> Presentation on Pro prials Received for 9,50 Falmouth Road Affordable Housing Prole t: Evan, <br /> Lehrer: <br /> Evan Lehrer, Town Planner facilitated the meeting by giving an overview ew of the comparative <br /> evaluation criteria utilized in the review process. In response to the Request for Proposal, (2) <br /> proposals were received. Each proposal met the minimum threshold criteria. <br /> The proposal submitted by the Preservation of Affordable Housing,Inc. and Housing Assistance <br /> 0 <br /> ' <br /> Corporation (POA H/HAC) showed considerable experience wi th the capacity to carry out the <br /> development proposal, and adequately demonstrated their ability to secure financing and to <br /> maintain the asset over the long-term. <br /> The proposal from Commonwealth Community Developers did not demonstrate the experience <br /> and capacity the Town was seeking in, a developer for this site, and the firm did not provide <br /> comparable reference projects and lacked the demonstrated ability to secure financing for <br /> projects of a similar scope. <br /> In utilizing the 950 Falmouth Road RFP Working Group Bidder Scoring Matrix AC <br /> POAH/H <br /> achieved a total score of 78/100. The Commonwealth Community Developers, LLC achieved a <br /> total-score of 52/100. <br /> With regards to the Commonwealth Community Developers, LLC Allan Isbitz indicated their <br /> proposal had merit. Five references were provided, and the firm appeared to meet the thres, old, <br /> I 1� <br /> but lacked the requirements for submission. Therefore, one firm was significantly stronger than <br /> the other. <br />