Laserfiche WebLink
so it was possible for it to be seen. The Chair asked if there were additional comments regarding <br /> the signage, to please share with the Board. <br /> The Chair referenced the May 2019 Town Meeting and amendments to Mashpee Zoning Bylaw <br /> Articles 26 and 27 regarding the Light Industrial Overlay District and Table Uses and changes to <br /> architectural and site design changes, as recommended by the Cape Cod Commission. The Chair <br /> recommended acquiring the changes from the Town Planner. Mr. Lizardi confirmed that he was <br /> familiar with the design standard recommendations. The Chair highly recommended that the <br /> project proponent's design meet the new standards set in the Bylaw. <br /> Mr. Rowley confirmed that a water quality report had been completed for the overall Evergreen <br /> subdivision. The Chair asked that the project proponent submit the letter as part of the record to <br /> confirm compliance. Mr. Lizardi confirmed that the Fire Department had reviewed the plan at <br /> Site Plan Review and Design Review and there were no objections noted. The Chair asked Mr. <br /> Lehrer for meeting minutes. Mr. Rowley inquired whether the Fire Department used their <br /> template to assess the turning radius and Mr. Lizardi responded that it was believed to be the WB <br /> 50 turning movement for larger trucks so it would not be an issue. Mr. Rowley recommended a <br /> letter from the Fire Department and Mr. Lizardi responded that he would request a letter. There <br /> was consensus from the Board that Mr. Rowley could consult with Mr. Lizardi regarding the <br /> plan. <br /> Mr. Lehrer noted that he had discussed the Cape Cod Commission's Design Guidelines at Plan <br /> and Design Review, but at that time, they had not yet been approved by the Attorney General but <br /> had since be approved and established retroactive to Town Meeting. <br /> The Chair opened the matter to Public Comment. <br /> Bob Laline, Main Street and across from the project, was present to learn more about the project. <br /> The Chair encouraged Mr. Laline to share his comments because the Planning Board wished to <br /> know howthe project could impact their property or living environment. The Chair noted that <br /> the property owner had a right to develop their property, but if they were seeking relief, they <br /> would need to show justification to allow for the relief. The Chair inquired if relief was being <br /> sought and Mr. Lizardi responded that a list had been submitted with the application, listing the <br /> items. The Chair referenced the Zoning Compliance table, Mr. Lizardi confirmed that they were <br /> not seeking relief for setbacks and lot coverages and would be meeting those regulations. Mr. <br /> Laline attended a prior meeting regarding a 40% buffer requirement that was reduced by 14%, <br /> allowing the removal of trees to dig a ditch for runoff, adding that his property often floods. It <br /> was confirmed that this was not the project seeking relief from the buffer requirement. Mr. <br /> Lizardi confirmed that they were protecting the 100 foot buffer offset from the residential areas <br /> and was not the site with the large depression. Mr. Laline stated his preference that zoning be <br /> maintained for these projects, specifically expressing concerns about drainage and signage <br /> issues. As a long-time resident,Mr. Laline also expressed preference for a fence so that he <br /> would not have to look at large commercial buildings and asked that the Town give <br /> 3 <br />