8/21/1985 PLANNING BOARD Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Planning Board Augu,,t 21'9 1985 Pagb 5 Planning Board and the Board of Appeals, If the Planning Board moves faster than the Board of Appeals he could file for an extension until he has dealt with them. The applicant explained that he was in the process of submitting plans to the Board of Appeals. Mr. Dubin suggested that he schedule a hearing with the Board of Appeals, then the Planning Board would schedule a hearing with his. The Planning Board would need a letter from the applicant confirming his agreement to get it to the Board of Appeals and agreeing to an extension, if necessary, to accomodate the Board of Appeals hearing prior to the Planning Board hearing. The applicant questioned why nothing had been done under Section 9.3, Mr. Dubin explained that he needed to use the terms of 9.4 to make the lots comply with zoning. Mr. Dubin explained further that the applicant's written letter will state that the Town and Corporation are fighting over ownership of the land. Be Discussion with Quashnet Valley Country Club of the location and status of Phinney's Lane. The applicant noted that he had received a letter from tic. Reardon who felt that Phinney•s Lane is not an ancient way, however there could be some usage. He explained to the Board where he believes Phinneyes Lane to be. Mr. Fudala commented that this whole problem started with a complaint from the Conservation Commission about access. The applicant noted that he is not cutting off the manly access to tam property.because Great Hay Road cuts in* The applicant explained that at his last meeting with the Board he was asked to re-present his Preliminary Plan. On March 20 he presented his plan to the Board, which turned it over to Tarn Counsel for review. He still has not heard from Town Counsel. Since his 7-month period is up on September 6, he requested a 3-month extension. Mr. Dubin told him that would not be possible because of the statutory limit. The applicant submitted a Preliminary Plan for one section and will submit a Definitive for the whole development on September 4., Mr. Fudala noted that, according to the special permit, the development was to be phased over a 5-year period. The applicant explained that he could not build any more units until the golf course and club house were completed. He had been held up for 2 years on the golf course with the Army Corps of Engineers and DEQE. Mr. Rowley suggested. that the applicant put an access read between the proposed road and town land at the closest point, which is about 3500. The applicant explained that there is quite a slope there. Mr. Rowley agreed to walk over the area. 9. Edward Grogan, represented by Kevin Kissane, Esq., in a discussion of his "Meetinghouse Village" proposal. Mr. Kissane asked the Board to reconsider its denial of the 204-unit