Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 1 <br /> Tom 'F. !F,uda'Ia <br /> From: edw.baker@comcast.net <br /> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:46 AM <br /> To: Tom F. Fudala <br /> Subject: clean map <br /> Tom, <br /> I'm a little confused on the clean map. I do think "not sewering" Poppy Island will end <br /> up as a big problem in the "Who pays for what" stage. <br /> Be that gas iit rnay., I was trying ito get,a ifedling for!how to maximize discharges closest to <br /> the`Sound when confusion set iin. <br /> .What is the requirement for discharge in a public water supply well zone? <br /> Are the map numbers correct? They differ from the "Alternative Scenarios/Site <br /> Evaluation Report". <br /> Bartlett looks ideal, surrounded by conservation lands with the only easy access from <br /> Great Hay, unfortunately. <br /> It is 0.21VI in the report and 600k on the map <br /> Keeter,on the other 1hand:goes from 1 EOM to 300`K. 'Does the fire,station !reduce.it that <br /> j rn uch'? <br /> After looking at the Commons latest, I'm wondering if we should be talking membrane <br /> filtration everywhere. As you know I am not on board the current ultimate goal of more <br /> worms in the Mashpee River muck. <br /> I do think the Commons should be carved out as an acquisition only after they have <br /> modified their plant and run their pipes. <br /> !Regards, <br /> Ed iB <br /> 11/3 0/2010 <br />