Laserfiche WebLink
Article IX Section 174-45.3..E.1 "Height General-Regardless of the type of mount,personal <br /> wireless service facilities shall be no higher than ten (10)feet above the average height of <br /> buildings within three hundred(300)feet. " <br /> Article IX Section 174-45.3.E2. Height, Ground-Mounted Facilities - Ground-mounted <br /> personal wireless service facilities shall not project higher than ten feet above the average <br /> building height or, if there are no buildings within three hundred(300 feet, these facilities <br /> shall not project higher than ten feet above the average tree canopy height, measured from <br /> ground level (AGL). If there are no buildings within three hundred(300)feet of the proposed <br /> site of the facility, all ground-mounted personal wireless service facilities shall be surrounded <br /> by dense tree growth to screen views of the facility in all directions. These trees may be existing <br /> on the subject property or planted on site. <br /> Only within the District can a height of 150 feet be permitted: <br /> Article IX Section 174-45.3.E.6 "Within the Wireless Facility Overlay District,personal <br /> wireless service facilities of up to one hundred(100)feet in height may be permitted by <br /> Special Permit, except that the Planning Board may grant a waiver to allow height up to two <br /> hundred(200)feet where circumstances warrant(e.g. no serious impacts on neighboring <br /> properties, residential areas...). <br /> In conclusion, the Mashpee Zoning Bylaw does not permit a 150'personal wireless service facility at <br /> 101 Red Brook Road as the land is located in zoning district R-3 and outside the Wireless Facility <br /> Overlay District. <br /> Chairman Waygan, Mr. Balzarini and Mr. Cummings agreed with the finding. <br /> Mr. Phelan and Mr. Callahan disagreed. <br /> Mr. Phelan stated that he disagreed with the finding because the ZBA provided a variance, so that it <br /> was irrelevant that the site was outside the Wireless Overlay District. Mr. Callahan agreed with Mr. <br /> Phelan that the ZBA granted a variance. Mr. Balzarini stated that the project proponent sought a <br /> variance for the height and not the location, but Mr. Phelan stated that the variance was for both. <br /> The Chair referenced page 7 of her findings addressing that matter. <br /> AL4SHPEE ZONING BOARD OFAPPEALS DECISION FOR A VARIANCE V-2019-10 WILL <br /> NEVER BE EFFECTIVE IN THIS MATTER.PER THE AL4SHPEE ZONING BYLAW AND <br /> M.G.L. Ch. 40A. <br /> As shown above, the Mashpee Zoning Bylaw does not permit a 150 foot personal wireless service <br /> facility at 101 Red Brook Road as the land is located in zoning district R-3 and outside the Wireless <br /> Facility Overlay District. <br /> The 150'personal wireless service facility, which is not permitted outside the Wireless Facility <br /> Overlay District, cannot be sited or constructed at 101 Red Brook Road, Mashpee, a location outside <br /> the District, by a variance issued by the Town of Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals as the Mashpee <br /> Zoning Bylaws do not expressly allow for a variance to authorize a prohibited use,per MGL CH 40A <br /> and the Mashpee Zoning Bylaw: <br /> 3 <br />