My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/04/2019 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
12/04/2019 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2021 9:50:00 AM
Creation date
10/26/2020 3:07:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/04/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Case 1:19-cv-12333 Document 1-4 Filed 11/13/19 Page 3 of 43 <br /> I <br /> Town of Nlashpee . <br /> 9� <br /> 16 Gr�eca Xec%'0pgcl Aral i <br /> Nkslapee,lb assachusetts 62649 <br /> The Town of Mashpee Zoning Bylaws do not allow the proposed wireless <br /> communications facility at 101 Red Brook Road, Mashpee, MA 02649 as the property <br /> Is outside of the Wireless Facility Overlay District. <br /> October 2018 Mashpee Town Meeting did not amend the Town of Mashpee Zoning <br /> Bylaws to Include 101 Red Brook Road, Mashpee, MA 02649 in.the Wireless Facility <br /> Overlay District. <br /> • Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals decision for a variance V-2019-10 is not effective <br /> in this matter as the decision Is not recorded with the Barnstable County Registry of <br /> Deeds. <br /> • Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals decision for a variance V-2019-10 will never be <br /> effective In this.matter pursuant to Mashpee Zoning Bylaw"Article VZ, §174-24K,"No <br /> use specifically listed in the table of use regulations shall be allowed by the Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals in any district where is It prohibited,"and Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A, §10,"Except where local ordinances or bylaws'shall expressly <br /> permit variances for a use, no variance may authorize a use or activity not otherwise <br /> permitted in the district in which the land or structure Is located. <br /> • Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals decision for a variance V-2019-10 would not be <br /> effective in this matter even If the property were located within the Wireless Facility <br /> Overlay•District pursuant to Mashpee Zoning Bylaw as it is the Planning Board, not <br /> the Zoning Board of Appeals, which may grant a waiver to allow additional height of <br /> a personal wireless service facility of within the Wireless Facllity'overlay District. <br /> The applicant falls to address the how the proposed wireless service facility will be <br /> monitored and maintained, and how it shall bond the facllity-In case of abandonment or <br /> discontinuance of use as required by Article IX, §174 45,31 Monitoring and Maintenance <br /> provisions (1), (2),'and §174.45,3,M Abandonment or Discontinuatlon of Ilse provisions <br /> (1), (2),and (3) <br /> In voting for the proposal members Phelan and Callahan made the following flndings. <br /> • Variance relief was granted by the Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals and the <br /> proposed 1501 monopoles location outside of the.Wireless Facility overlay District is <br /> Irrelevant unless that decision Is overturned. <br /> • The proposed monopole would not inflict dramatic and wholly unnecessary adverse <br /> impacts upon the aesthetics and character of neighboring homes given that the <br /> applicant stated a commitment to camouflaging the proposed monopole at the <br /> discretion of the Planning Board, and also that its proposed.location mitigates <br /> visibility to as many neighboring homes as Is feasible, <br /> • The proposed monopole would be a dramatic benefit to public safety as there is a <br /> significant coverage gap In South Mashpee impacting emergency response. I <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.