Laserfiche WebLink
Case 1:19-cv-12333 Document 1-4 Filed 11/13/19 Page 12 of 43 <br /> 126/216 Red Brook Road-obscured visibility <br /> 95-103 Degrass Road-can be seen <br /> 56 Blue Castle Drive-can be seen ' <br /> 48-56 Blue Castle Drive-not visible <br /> 1182 Gray Road, 66 Red Brook Road, 701 Great Neck Road South, 50 Sipps Road, 664&575 <br /> Great Neck.Road South, 5 Driftwood Way-not visible <br /> 112 Summersea Road-some seasonal visibility <br /> 118-120 Polaris Road-not visible <br /> Ms.Thompson noted that all locations were chosen in consultation with the Town and the Cape Cod <br /> Commission. The Chair inquired about the NEPA screening report. Ms. Thompson responded that <br /> there was a separate analysis of historic homes and it was determined that there were no impacts to <br /> historic homes. The Chair ask that the report be provided,referencing a concern previously expressed <br /> about a particular camera angle,of a historic home. Ms.Thompson responded that images were <br /> provided in the photo simulations,but that the report could also be provided electronically. Ms. <br /> Thompson noted that the locations depicted included the Aiken Gertrude House,the Amos Horatio <br /> House, Children's Museum and the Landing at Gertrude Way. <br /> There was consensus from the Board for the Chair to open to Public Comment, <br /> Tom Rose,Mashpee Police Captain,stated that south Mashpee had terrible cell and radio service. <br /> Captain Rose specifically referenced the recent micro burst and the lack of service necessary to assist <br /> with coordinating safety efforts. Captain Rose expressed concern about the lack of service for reasons <br /> of safety. <br /> Howard Kahalis,Mashpee and Boston resident,stated that he paid taxes to Mashpee and agreed with <br /> Captain Rose that there was no cell service on the day of the micro burst, and expressed concern about <br /> being able to locate his grandchildren. Mr.Kahalis questioned scheduling meetings after the summer, <br /> when New Seabury residents were not in town. Mr. Kahalis stated that,as taxpayers,they were <br /> entitled to cell service for safety reasons, adding that it would be a breach of fiduciary relationship <br /> should any Planning Board member vote against the proposal,suggesting that any injuries or deaths <br /> resulting from voting against the cell tower would be the responsibility of the Planning Board. The <br /> Chair asked that Mr. Kahalis not threaten Planning Board members and make the issue personal. Mr. <br /> Kahalis stated that he was in favor of the proposal. <br /> Andrew Gregory McKelvey,member of the Finance Committee and resident of Popponesset,stated <br /> that often cell service was available with WIFI or with the help of a cell booster. However,with the. <br /> loss of power,there was very limited cell service in the area and he expressed concern regarding <br /> safety,particularly for people with medical issues. The recent microburst,created a significant <br /> challenge for safety and accessibility to cell service. Mr.McKelvey supported the proposed cell tower, <br /> Maureen Holland; Uncle Percy's Road,shared her experience during the microburst,including being <br /> unable to leave her property. Ms.Holland expressed safety concerns if she had needed to reach <br /> anyone by cell phone and stated her support for the proposed project. <br /> . 6 <br />