My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/1/2020 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
7/1/2020 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 5:00:44 PM
Creation date
1/5/2021 1:49:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/01/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion to accept the bill for $550. Ms. Waygan seconded the <br /> motion. Roll call vote: Mr. Balzarini-yes; Ms. Waygan-yes; Mr. Callahan-yes; Mr. Fulone-yes; <br /> Chairman Phelan-yes <br /> TOWN PLANNER REPORT <br /> Update to Subdivision Rules and Regulations and Special Permit Regulations-Mr. Rowley <br /> suggested including information to be provided on the plans, possibly including a means to depart the <br /> traveled way, to address the matter of postal access. Mr. Rowley also suggested the possibility that the <br /> detail could be considered within the regulation or during the review of the project. Mr. Lehrer <br /> recommended keeping the language general to use as a means to ensure that the developer engaged <br /> with the Postmaster prior to submitting an application. In addition, the Planning Board had no <br /> authority on the site regarding the location for postal services. Mr. Rowley suggested that language be <br /> included that, in addition to consulting with the Postmaster,the developer would work with the <br /> Planning Board to establish details about the particular site of the location. Mr. Rowley would work <br /> with Mr. Lehrer regarding specific language. Ms. Waygan inquired whether a Public Hearing would <br /> be necessary and Mr. Lehrer confirmed that it would, as well as be submitted to Town Clerk and Land <br /> Court. Mr. Rowley inquired whether the Zoning Bylaw would also require the change and Mr. Lehrer <br /> responded that he would look into the matter further. Mr. Callahan suggested that with limited land in <br /> Town, it would likely not be a great issue, and Mr. Lehrer noted that could be the case, under existing <br /> zoning. Mr. Lehrer suggested that the amendment could avoid the recent issue encountered at <br /> Evergreen Circle. Mr. Lehrer would work with Mr. Rowley to finalize the language for the <br /> amendment. <br /> Stormwater Task Force-Mr. Lehrer confirmed that he and Mr. Rowley met with the DPW <br /> consultants to discuss necessary Bylaw amendments to maintain compliance of the MS4 Stormwater <br /> Permit. Mr. Lehrer was in receipt of recommendations from June 29, which he has shared with the <br /> Board. Mr. Lehrer was seeking authorization from the Board to submit placeholders for Articles <br /> related to MS4 Stormwater, in time for the deadline for Zoning Bylaw changes. <br /> MOTION: Ms. Waygan made a motion to request that the Board of Selectmen make a <br /> placeholder for this proposed Zoning Bylaw Change. Mr. Balzarini seconded the motion. Roll <br /> call vote: Mr. Balzarini-yes; Ms. Waygan-yes; Mr. Callahan-yes; Mr. Fulone-yes; Chairman <br /> Phelan-yes <br /> Ms. Waygan referenced previous consideration of the Zoning Bylaw and the lack of site plan review to <br /> accept public input, and suggested it as an addition. Mr. Lehrer confirmed that Plan Review noticed <br /> abutters and posted an agenda. Mr. Lehrer reported that some of the recommended suggestions <br /> appeared to be duplicative. Mr. Rowley noted that it was believed the consultants, within their report, <br /> could provide suggestions as to how best assure compliance with the Regulations. However, Mr. <br /> Rowley found limited suggestions in the Report to help make the Regulations more compliant. Mr. <br /> Rowley noted that contractors were required to submit a sediment and erosion control plan and <br /> application with the EPA, for projects over one acre. It was unclear whether a filing would be <br /> necessary with the State and the Planning Board, Mr. Lehrer agreed that there was not clarity. Mr. <br /> Lehrer confirmed that, with the Covid-19 Pandemic, the EPA had modified their deadlines for making <br /> the amendments, with a deadline of July 2021. Mr. Lehrer will continue to work with Mr. Rowley and <br /> others regarding the matter and would report their findings at future meetings. <br /> CONSULTING ENGINEER'S REPORT <br /> Cape Cod Coffee-Mr. Rowley reported that the contractor planned to revegetate the area <br /> which was the subject of a complaint by an abutter. Mr. Rowley and Mr. Lehrer have met with the <br /> contractor and the developer, who have proposed to remove all sand dumped on the site, replace the <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.