My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-Annual Town Report
>
1988-Annual Town Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2021 2:58:19 PM
Creation date
1/11/2021 2:58:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Annual_Town_Report
DocType
Annual Town Report
Year
1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> a new six-foot bicycle trail along the westerly side of the Road (Drawing No. 16 — Schematic Design) as con- <br /> existing Great Oak Road - the overall estimated cost is templated in 1981 "Agreement". <br /> $300,000. The"Committee"vigorously opposed this pro- (3)The Board also rejected a provision in the"Memoran- ,.. <br /> posal and took the firm position that the Agreement bet- dum" the effect of which would permit parking by a <br /> ween Town of Mashpee and "DEM" dated June 1981 number of employees of DEM on specific locations of <br /> ("Agreement")and discussions prior thereto contemplated South Cape Beach, thus resulting in parking in excess of . <br /> and intended that Great Oak Road would be reconstructed 400 vehicles,being the maximum number permitted by the <br /> and improved substantially in accordance with the 1981 "Agreement". i <br /> specifications referred to in Drawing No. 16-"Great Oak Thereafter,Chairman Kirsner and other members of the V <br /> Road-rebuild alternative"and that legal alignment of its "Committee" have met with Representative Cahir, and <br /> boundary lines so as to conform to paper right of way be Robert E. Kumor in an effort to resolve these issues.It ap- <br /> addressed and resolved prior to improvement. pears that meaningful progress is being made in this direc- <br /> After a number of meetings initiated by Representative tion,and hopefully the matters may be resolved within the <br /> Thomas Cahir with Richard Kendall, former Commis- next few months so that the"Memorandum"may be again <br /> sioner of"DEM", Steve Carroll, Chairman of Transpor- presented to the Board. <br /> tation, Robert Kumor, Deputy Commissioner of"DEM" Under the provisions of the 1981 "Agreement","DEM" <br /> and attended by Chairman Kirsner and other represen- agreed to reserve a suitable site consisting of ten(10)acres <br /> tatives of the"Committee",it appeared that the serious im- on Great River, Waquoit Bay,for future use and develop- <br /> passe between"DEM"and the"Committee"was apparently ment by the Town of a Boat Launch and Pier Facility. <br /> resolved by an understanding reached between the"Com- There had developed some interest that the stated use of Nd <br /> mittee"and"DEM"(expressly subject to the approval of the site possibly be expanded to include the building of a 'a? <br /> the Board of Selectmen) wherebyI " " would <br /> ( ) DEMpro- Field Station by Boston University to conduct Marine <br /> teed with the recommended overlay and other im- research in the Waquoit Bay area and to be funded in part <br /> provements(Drawing No. 14)(II)the Town and"DEM", be a charitable endowment from the Sea Farm Founda- <br /> subject to the guidance of Representative Cahir, would tion, Incorporated. The "Committee", pursuant to a re- <br /> jointly initiate steps to obtain additional funding to im- quest from the Board of Selectmen to review the proposal, <br /> prove Great Oak Road as originally intended(Drawing No. conducted a number of public hearings. It was determin- <br /> 16),(III)all legal and architectural costs,land damages and ed that the State had just purchased the Swift Estate, that <br /> other related costs and expense that might otherwise be in- Federal Funding was available to deal with the estuary and <br /> curred by the"Town"to legally conform Great Oak Road sanctuary research which will be conducted out of the Swift <br /> to the Plan on record with the Land Court would be paid Estate and the entire eco-system of Waquoit Bay. This is <br /> from these funds; (IV)"DEM"would assume full respon- a major undertaking, funded by the U.S. Dept. of Com- <br /> sibility for any maintenance thereafter required to Great merce, and The National and Atmospheric Administra- <br /> Oak Road pending its final improvement (Drawing No. tion. For this and other pertinent reasons, the"Commit- P <br /> 16). These provisions were thereafter incorporated into the tee"was of the opinion that it would be inappropriate for <br /> "Memorandum" between the Town and "DEM" to be the ten-acre site to be used by an independent party, i.e. <br /> presented to the Board of Selectmen for their approval. a separate satellite, and the Committee so recommended <br /> It is important to note at this time that Great Oak Road to the Board. <br /> as presently travelled enroaches upon land owned by The"Committee"had requested on a number of occa- <br /> Robert Kennedy who,therefore, could not build upon it. sions"DEM"for an in-depth study and eventual report as <br /> This condition had existed for ten years. In order to ad- to "Park" capacity. This is a vital issue to the "Commit- <br /> dress the inequity of this problem quickly and conform tee"which desires to restrict any excessive use of this fragile <br /> Great Oak Road as it encroached upon the Kennedy land area. "DEM"has promised to submit its study on "Park r. <br /> to recorded plan and also to avoid possible legal action, Capacity"to the"Committee"shortly and further has in- :c <br /> the "Board" sponsored an Article to appropriate and ex- dicated that it will address the issue of"Park Capacity" <br /> pend $40,000 to correct this problem. This matter, thoroughly in the new Environmental Impact Report. <br /> however,had not been addressed in the Memorandum of ("EIR") <br /> Understanding. The"Committee"and many residents of Mashpee were <br /> The Board, when presented the"Memorandum"for con- deeply concerned about a newspaper article which pro- <br /> sideration declined to approve same for a number of jetted the use of the"Park"as being grossly excessive.The <br /> reasons: "Committee"is dedicated to its intentions to avoid any ex- <br /> (1) Board felt appropriate provisions should have been cessive use and to protect the fragile area. <br /> made for reimbursement to Town of the $40,000 so In the late spring of 1988, the "Committee" at one of <br /> expended. its regular monthly meetings, was presented with a brief , <br /> (2)In the absence of more appropriate provisions"Board" summary of the"EIR"prepared by"DEM"relative to the 4.. ;4 <br /> rejected proposal for"DEM"to improve Great Oak Road "Park."Unfortunately, these formal reports had not been _ <br /> with temporary overlay (Drawing No. 14) of Schematic made available to the Board of Selectmen, Town Depart- <br /> Design, and insisted that DEM reconstruct Great Oak ments, "Committee"or to the general public so that they 'h. <br /> ,l <br /> - 97 - <br /> .t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.