Laserfiche WebLink
Importantly though, it showed that the methodology <br /> Report of the and assumptions used to calculate the project tax rate <br /> Finance Committee were essentially correct. Hopefully, the Finance <br /> Committee report, including projecting a tax rate, <br /> added to the residents' understanding of the budget <br /> To the Honorable Members of the Board of process and issues, so each could make amore <br /> Selectmen and the Citizens of the Town of Mashpee: informed decision when asked to vote on the budget. <br /> In 2005, Finance Committee was pleased to pre- <br /> sent as part of the May Annual Town Meeting Warrant Not only did the new Charter require the Finance <br /> booklet, its first attempt at compliance with the Committee to evaluate the financial warrants before <br /> Mashpee Charter requirement to provide the voters Town Meeting, but also it required the committee to <br /> with a concise and readable financial report describ- <br /> make its recommendation on all Warrants included on <br /> ing the revenues and consolidated expenses" as part of the Town Meeting agenda. This second requirement <br /> the Fiscal Year's municipal operating budget. was accomplished at the October Special Town <br /> Meeting at which the FinCom made its written sum- <br /> In addition to a one page summary of the operat- mary and recommendation to the voters on all 33 <br /> ing expenses and other back-up explanations and Warrant Articles before them. <br /> tables, the financial impact of the budget on the resi- <br /> dents was provided by the FinCom through the esti- Both of these initial reports were well received <br /> mation of the resultant property tax rate to support the by the residents. In fact, the "Mashpee Enterprise" <br /> first time this informa- Published a very favorable editorial on the FinCom's <br /> proposed budget. This was the <br /> tion had ever been provided as part of the budget dis- <br /> cussions. The members of the Finance Committee look <br /> If the budget was approved as presented,the pro- forward to improving on its efforts for the 2006 Town <br /> jected tax rate provided for May Town Meeting was Meetings. <br /> $6.59/$1,000 of property assessment,or an increase of Respectfully submitted, <br /> $0.10/$1,000 from the FY '05 rate. In December, <br /> when the actual tax rate was struck by the Tax Gerald J. Umina, Chairman <br /> Assessor, the final rate turned out to be $6.34/$1,000, Desiree Hendricks-Moreno, Vice Chairman <br /> or a$0.15/$1,000 decrease from the prior year's rate. Christopher Avis <br /> The $0.25 difference between the projected and final Charles E. Gasior <br /> tax rate was directly attributable to a 6.75%increase in Robert HutchinsonKenneth Patrick <br /> the town's total of assessments versus the anticipated <br /> 3% increase used to calculate the projected tax rate. <br /> Y <br /> i <br /> y <br /> i <br /> j <br /> 21 <br />