Laserfiche WebLink
The following is a report of the Building <br /> j Department on the permits pulled, fees collected, <br /> occupancies issued, estimated costs, meetings sched- <br /> uled, and number of inspection requests. <br /> New construction single family homes 41 Estimated Cost $ 17,614,390.00 I <br /> New construction for condo units 71 $ 12,080,300.00 <br /> 112 $ 29,694,690.00 , <br /> 'I Certificate of occupancy issued for new construction 93 <br /> Certificate of occupancy issued for condominium 53 <br /> i 146 <br /> Total number of permits pulled and the fees collected <br /> Ij Building Permits 501 Fee Collected $ 262,704.00 <br /> Wire Permits 575 $ 32,853.00 <br /> Alarm Permits 260 $ 6,640.00 <br /> Plumbing Permits 428 $ 27,657.00 <br /> Gas Permits 497 $ 19,298.00 <br />'I Wood Stove Permits 13 $ 130.00 <br /> Signs 20 $ 1,750.00 <br /> Short Form (Roof,Windows, Siding) 232 $ 13,377.00 <br /> 2526 $ 364,409.00 <br /> The Plan Review Committee held meetings once every month and twice in December. <br /> The Design Review Committee reviewed plans for projects every month except December. <br /> There were 2,526 permits pulled an average of 48 permits per week, approximately three inspections for each <br /> permit pulled totals 7,578 inspections per year. <br /> I <br /> r <br /> mental staff will be effectively utilized for years(o'. <br /> Report of the come. Stepping up to replace Michael Talbot is Mr'. <br /> Conservation CommissionJohn Rogers, who joined the Commission in 2006 and <br /> has been a worthy addition. His local knowledge of <br /> Mashpee and New Seabury in particular will be esp <br /> To the Honorable Board of Selectmen and the cially beneficial to the commission. Lastly,Associat¢' <br /> Citizens of the Town of Mashpee: John Miller stepped down from his post. <br /> Most' <br /> recently, Mr. Miller served as liaison to the Blu¢ <br /> 2006 saw the Conservation Commission remain Ribbon Committee (BRC) and was diligent in repod- <br /> rather static compared to previous years. For the first ing back to the commission as the BRC was conduct <br /> time in the last three years, the department staff ing its agenda. <br /> remained the same from beginning to end. This con- <br /> sistency helped the department become even more of a In contrast to 2005,the permitting function of the <br /> cohesive unit and allowed for improved efficiency department slowed quite a bit. Last year saw a net <br /> with interdepartmental dealings as the faces remained increase of 4% in filings from 2004 to 2005;howevc6 <br /> constant and working relationships grew. in the last year there was a decrease in the numberol <br /> NOI and RDA filings. The department thinks this has <br /> In 2006, we saw no turnover in the department to do with the fact that the town is slowly but surely <br /> nd New <br /> staff; however, there was some turnover on the making its way towards build out conditions a <br /> Commission. After roughly 6 years of service, Seabury had a huge influx of development last yeK <br /> Michael Talbot stepped down from the Commission. Furthermore, we think we may have retreated back <br /> His expertise in his various fields will be sorely what will become a normal year filing wise for(hz <br /> missed,and the knowledge that he passed on to depart- department. <br /> 102 <br />