Laserfiche WebLink
shall determine whether the appeal is valid within 65 days from their fist hearing, and <br /> promptly notify the requester and appellant via certified mail. <br /> 5. Any objection. to the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals, or their failure to issue a <br /> decis,ion within 65 days, may be appealed in writing by either the requester(s) or <br /> abutter(s) to the Board of Selectmen within 25 days. The Selectmen shall hear the appeal <br /> at a public hearing within 65 days. Selectmen shall accept written and verbal comments <br /> form all interested parties, and decide by vote within the next 65 days whether to sustain <br /> or reject the Request to remove Obstruction. If the Selectmen deny the appeal, the <br /> decision may then be appealed per MGL Chapter 40A, Section 17 Judicial review. <br /> Submitted by Petition <br /> Explanation: The Article, if approved at Town Meeting, provides for two amendments to the <br /> Zoning By-Laws: (1) To modify the definition of STREET to include all recorded public or <br /> private rights of way, (private ways exist in many Mashpee subdivisions) including those which <br /> may provide access to the water. (2) To create a new By-Law which provides a procedure to <br /> implement removal of obstructions. <br /> The purpose of this proposed Zoning By-Law is to provide property owners, associations of <br /> property owners and individual residents an effective remedy to maintain their lawful travel over <br /> rights of way by requesting the Town to remove obstructions, including fences, bulkheads at <br /> shoreline, structures or impediments which are located in a street or public or private right of <br /> way legally laid out. The Town may charge a maximum fee of$75; however it is believed that <br /> there will be only minor, if any, expense to the Town because construction or placement of <br /> obstructions in streets or rights of way is an occasional problem, and future obstructions would <br /> be discouraged. This By-Law, if approved, should minimize or prevent conflicts among <br /> residents because the Town will be the impartial decision maker and remover of obstructions. <br /> The proposal also prevents obstructions in rights of way, which lead to the shoreline, thus <br /> fulfilling Goal 2 of Mashpee's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> GOAL 2: TO MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE PUBLIC ACCESS, TO AND ENJOYMENT OF <br /> MASHPEE'S COASTAL RESOURCES WITHOUT DEGRADING THOSE RESOURCES. <br /> 'T To ensure that development and redevelopment does not interfere with existing public access <br /> and traditional public rights-of-way to and along the shoreline or with public rights of fishing, <br /> fowling and navigation.. <br /> Planning Board voted at a Public Hearing held on April 7, 2004 5-0 to make no <br /> recommendation. <br /> Motion made by Edward Larkin to indefinitely postpone Article 13. <br /> Motion to indefinitely postpone passes at 9:56 p.m. <br /> 21 <br />