My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/05/1998 Annual Town Meeting
>
10/05/1998 Annual Town Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2025 12:41:17 PM
Creation date
3/1/2021 2:35:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Town Meeting Warrants
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(4) Waiver of filing requirements. <br /> The Board may waive one or more of the application filing requirements of this <br /> section if it finds that such information is not needed for a thorough review of the <br /> proposed personal wireless service facility. <br /> J. Co-location. <br /> (1) Licensed carriers shall share personal wireless service facilities and sites where <br /> feasible and appropriate, thereby reducing the number of personal wireless service <br /> facilities that are stand-alone facilities. All applicants for a special permit for a <br /> personal wireless service facility shall demonstrate a good faith effort to co-locate <br /> with other carriers. Such good faith effort includes: <br /> (a) A survey of all existing structures that may be feasible sites for co-locating <br /> personal wireless service facilities; <br /> (b) Contact with all the other licensed carriers for commercial mobile radio <br /> services operating in Mashpee and each of the adjoining towns; and <br /> (c) Sharing information necessary to determine if co-location is feasible under <br /> the design configuration most accommodating to co-location. <br /> (2) In the event that co-location is found to be not feasible, a written statement of the <br /> reasons for the infeasibility shall be submitted to the Board. The Board may retain a <br /> technical expert in the field of RF engineering to verify if co-location at the site is <br /> not feasible or is feasible given the design configuration most accommodating to <br /> co-location. The cost for such a technical expert will be at the expense of the <br /> applicant. The Board may deny a special permit to an applicant that has not <br /> demonstrated a good faith effort to provide for co-location. <br /> (3) If the applicant does intend to co-locate or to permit co-location, the Board shall <br /> request drawings and studies that show the ultimate appearance and operation of the <br /> personal wireless service facility at full build-out. <br /> (4) If the Board approves co-location for a personal wireless service facility site, the <br /> special permit shall indicate how many facilities of what type shall be permitted on <br /> that site. Facilities specified in the special permit approval shall require no further <br /> zoning approval. However, the addition of any facilities not specified in the <br /> approved special permit shall require a new special permit. Estimates of RFR <br /> emissions will be required for all facilities, including proposed and future facilities. <br /> Page 57 of 63 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.