Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Waygan asked Mr. Lehrer if he was able to complete the statement on Open Space. Mr. <br /> Lehrer responded that he left this section completely blank. The Open Space and Recreation <br /> plan identifies parcels for acquisition but the chapter in the LCP includes much more than this <br /> such as habitat and wildlife,habitat preservation and wetlands restoration. He stated that he is <br /> working with the Conservation Agent on this section since this is their area of expertise. He will <br /> have this completed by the next meeting. <br /> Ms. Waygan said that under Resources there was a list of town documents listed and much work <br /> had been previously completed by the Land Bank and the Town Planner on identifying lots that <br /> fit into other plans such as the Mashpee Wildlife Refuge Plan. She felt that this information <br /> needed to be included and said that she refers to this information very often. She indicated that <br /> this information needed to be updated since some of the lots listed have since been sold. Mr. <br /> Lehrer agreed this information was meant to be included and asked if there were any other <br /> documents that should be added and that he will check with his fellow Department Heads to be <br /> sure he is not overlooking anything. The Board had no further comments on the RFP. <br /> Discuss Comparative Evaluation Criteria of the RFP <br /> Ms. Waygan asked if the Board could next discuss the comparative evaluation criteria <br /> attachments for the RFP. With reference to rating a consultant, Ms. Waygan felt extra points <br /> should be earned if they had experience working on the Cape. Mr. Lehrer suggested that under <br /> Strength and Credibility, he could add that it would be highly advantageous if the consultant has <br /> had previous experience working on at least one project on Cape Cod. He said he would rework <br /> this area and insert this information to the rating criteria and present it at the next meeting. Ms. <br /> Waygan next discussed the price area of the evaluation. Mr. Lehrer clarified if the consultant <br /> exceeded $150,000 there would be no points scored. There were no further additions or <br /> comments. <br /> Review and Discuss Proposed Kick off Workshop outline for Vision Process <br /> The Board next proceeded to discuss the proposed kick off workshop outline for the Visioning <br /> Process. Mr. Phelan said he reviewed the draft outline prepared by Mr. Lehrer and was pleased <br /> with what was presented. He then invited the Board for questions and comments. Mr. Lehrer <br /> pointed out that this outline specifically refers only to the kick off workshop. He noted that he <br /> generated the outline using best practices which resulted in an ending outline and strategy similar <br /> to those used by both Yarmouth and Bourne. The goal is to conduct an analysis either in person <br /> or virtually to identify the strength, opportunities and weaknesses and threats to get an <br /> understanding of what the foundation for the vision statement will be. This will allow the Board <br /> to focus on these core ideas in future meetings to narrow down to building natural community <br /> systems. Mr. Lehrer elaborated that the scope of the work in the RFP currently reflects that the <br /> consultant be able to provide services minimally for the Community Engagement Action Plan <br /> and Visioning Workshops as defined by the Board. He stated that he left the opportunity for the <br /> consultant to not only acknowledge our needs but provided the opportunity to elaborate on what <br /> they can offer. The Board agreed to discuss this draft of the criteria at a future meeting. <br /> 3 <br />