Laserfiche WebLink
`. 0'W�'L O ,��a h G' �'Cannin Baard- <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> :Mashpee, Massa.chusett's 02649 <br /> Ms. Waygan would like clarity on the 2181 being the last meeting about these topics until the regulating <br /> plan and design guide are complete. If they don't give us the information we are asking for we should <br /> just say come back when you are ready. <br /> Mr. Lehrer commented with exception to parking ratios, it is the last meeting. <br /> Chairman Fulone stated there are two more meetings scheduled. Parking is the last meeting. <br /> Mr. Lehrer will provide the list of already asked questions Friday, then additional questions will need to <br /> be given to him Monday, he will send them over to Mashpee Commons for Tuesday. <br /> Review recommendations for Local Comprehensive Plan consultants and score proposals in <br /> accordance with Comparative Evaluation Criteria of issued RFP. <br /> The following conversation between the Planning Board is in regards to scoring the two proposals for <br /> consultants in regards to the RFP. Transcription is modified as conversation included running down a <br /> list of questions and simply just stating yes or no, Dialogue would be hard to follow. <br /> - Weston and Sampson <br /> - Principle Group <br /> Weston and Sampson <br /> Mr. Fulone questioned when the subcommittee met was there a CD or thumb drive, that requirement <br /> was missing from Principle. <br /> Mr. Lehrer noted they were both equally not responsive to that request. He asked if partial points are <br /> being awarded there is an explanation as to why. <br /> Total score of 92. <br /> Principle Group <br /> Ms. Waygan commented on their community engagement plan being an example of what they did in a <br /> different town. <br /> Mr. Phelan noted it called for a general outline. <br /> Mr. Fulone said it was a benchmark and it was a similar town to Mashpee. <br /> Mr. Lehrer stated the intent of providing the draft was to let them know our vision. It was also made <br /> clear in the RFP as well as the pre-proposal discussion, we aren't married to this 100% and they need <br /> to deliver something at least this good. If it is not that good, don't award the points. We spent time <br /> producing an RFP that was clear and concise, we want a response to this. <br /> Total score of 64.5. <br /> 4 <br />