Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> Board of Selectmen <br /> Minutes <br /> June 21, 2021 <br /> Kristy Senatori—Executive Director of the Cape Cod Commission: (continued) <br /> Discussions regarding the legal aspect of the Development Agreement continued. It was recommended there <br /> should be definition regarding Town authority within the confines of the language, and if the project is no <br /> longer serving the most favorable interest of either party could there be a clause to subtract their respective <br /> interest? What legal authority does the Development Agreement imply with the use of the zoning amendment <br /> for 25 plus years? Does the Development Agreement replace a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) <br /> review? <br /> Ms. Senatori indicated she would provide a copy of the Development Agreement to the Town of Mashpee. <br /> It was noted there would be opportunities in the process to present modifications to the Agreement. <br /> There was a question as to how density is calculated and if a specific formula is utilized and if a 25-year <br /> development plan is unreasonable. It was noted the density is defined in the development proposal and it is <br /> anticipated this project would entail a lengthy agreement which is in general common practice. <br /> It was highly recommended the Cape Cod Commission work collaboratively with the Town of Mashpee on <br /> this matter. The Town will conduct its parallel review process, however there should be opportunities for <br /> joint meetings. It was suggested the CCC outline the process to include future joint meetings. <br /> It was also recommended the Town conduct a broader review of the process and not focus solely on zoning. <br /> There was also concern with respect to the zoning amendments. It was strongly recommended the <br /> Development Agreement be executed before the zoning amendments are voted upon. It was stated the <br /> Development Agreement implies that only Mashpee Commons can amend the Agreement. With a lengthy <br /> 25-year agreement, if the project is not in the most favorable interest of the Town there should be a method <br /> to rescind. Ms. Senatori indicated there is a rescind section within the regulation which requires <br /> ratification by all parties relative to the Three-Party Agreement. <br /> Ms. Senatori indicated the Cape Cod Commission at their subcommittee hearing would receive public <br /> testimony and discuss permitted uses and densities as well as project impacts and potential mitigation <br /> strategies as well as the duration of the agreement and any terms and conditions to be mutually agreed upon <br /> between the participating parties. The subcommittee may direct the drafting of the Development <br /> Agreement and would make a recommendation to the full Commission. <br /> In accordance with the Development Agreement process in the Town of Mashpee,the Planning Board is <br /> the negotiating team to negotiate the propers. The Agreement would therefore be required to be voted on <br /> affirmatively by the Planning Board before it if forwarded to the Board of Selectmen for approval. Any <br /> recommended changes would be required to be remitted back to the Planning Board for re-affirmation. It <br /> was thus recommended the(Process)template include the Planning Board. <br /> Ms. Senatori indicated that goals are listed on the CCC website including information relative to the Regional <br /> Policy Plan. It was recommended the list of RPP goals be forwarded to the Town of Mashpee. <br />