Laserfiche WebLink
r , <br /> I <br /> a <br /> I <br /> The representative from Pimlico heights asked to go on <br /> record complaining that he is being displaced by someone <br /> beyond him in the agenda. <br /> Tony stated that the Beechwood Point matter is an important <br /> issue which must be resolved and stated that explained that , <br /> the Board attempted to call Pimlico Heights at other ' <br /> I <br /> hearings and there was no representative present. <br /> Applicant: Earl Mills, Sr. ` <br /> Hearing was continued at this time, <br /> - + I <br /> Robert Mills, Earl Mills, Sr, and Mike McGrath were present. +;,► <br /> Mr. McGrath presented a letter to the Board outlining his <br /> _= position on the engineering for the intersection. '' <br /> Tony asked if they had gotten together with Ernie Virg illio ' <br /> to see what technical information he needed as the Board <br /> had asked at the last hearing? <br /> Mr. McGrath stated that when they met with Mr. VirrM{illio on <br /> ✓ 'I l I <br /> the grounds, he told him what he wanted and he has accepted � <br /> the plan. <br /> He stated that it is a significant amount of work to do <br /> the engineering and he does not believe this subdivision <br /> will burden the intersection that much that �it would require <br /> I <br /> that amount of work to be done by the applicant. It <br /> He doesn' t think that private people should be preparing that kind on engineering drawing, it is beyond the scope of <br /> the Board to require it. <br /> Tony explained that it is not the size of the subdivision, <br /> it is the safety issue that must be resolved. <br /> Mr. Earl Mills, Sr. stated to the Board that this issue <br /> started on Sept 10 1987. It started on the wrong foot with <br /> validity of his signature questioned. Then the Board said it <br /> did not appear that he was the record owner of the ro ert <br /> p � yr <br /> which was not true. He had a Water Quality report prepared I . <br /> which cost $8, 000 and he has not gotten anything from it. Ito <br /> He stated that every time they have meet with the Board they � <br /> I <br /> have been cooperative. They have made changes in the size <br /> II <br /> of the lawns and in the direction of the road and have met <br /> on site. Every time the Board asks for a change to the plan <br /> it costs thousands of dollars. He believes that he, his <br /> lawyer and his architect have been tremendously cooperative. <br /> He explained that he doesn't have the resource of a builder, <br /> `+ he is a private citizens and the land has been in his family <br /> since before <br /> e the time of deeds. It has already cost him <br /> $38 000 and the are not near to an a i <br /> . Y approval yet . He i s <br /> Just trying to parcel back land he inherited to his brothers <br /> and sisters. He understands their position as a Board but <br /> hopes they understand his position also. He was under the h, <br /> impression the plans had been a _. P p approved and a few weeks aao <br /> it was brought to his attention that he had to re--design t.ie <br /> intersection on a state highway. This does not seem to be <br /> r <br /> i <br /> 7 <br />