Laserfiche WebLink
Commission for Policies 13 27 3 and 39. The Board ofHealth commented about soil absorption <br /> in Policy 1, but the Policy had already been corrected. In Policy 2, the Board of Health already <br /> required 150 feet. The Conservation Commission recommended that a specific source be <br /> incorporated regarding endangered species. 'Mere was also discussion about drift fences. The <br /> Conservation Commission recommended the allowance of a structure for research purposes. The <br /> Conservation Commission had no comments for Policy 3. Regarding Policy 39,the <br /> Conservation Commission inquired whether there were any exceptions for water dependent <br /> activities, such as aquaculture. Mr. Fudala added that a proposed shellfish grant located in Zone <br /> V was being challenged. Planning Board members liked the idea of incorproratmg an exception <br /> for a uaculture. Shellfish Constable Rich York recommended that the RPP be removed from <br /> Policy 9. There were no changes to Policies 10, 1.1 and 1 . Consideration of the remaining <br /> policies will take occur at a future meeting. <br /> .2011 regional Policy Plan Coastal Resources es sermons-Mr. Petersen v ill be drafting <br /> letter of comment from the Planning Board. Mr. Fudala reTerenced questions that had been <br /> previously posed by the Planning Board. Mr. Fudala reported that the CZM definition included <br /> all of Cape Cod and that a better definition would be worked on. Mr. Rowley had a question <br /> about reference to a 10 year flood plan and it was confirmed that it was not a typographical error. <br /> Members of the Planning Board-were unfamiliar with the existence of a 10 year flood plan. <br /> Regarding LSCSF boundaries, it was noted that they were the same as the FEMA A Zones. Mr. <br /> Petersen expressed concern about the re-wording, suggesting that any work in the A Zones <br /> would not impair the movement of flood water which could negatively impact many properties. <br /> There was additional discussion about the policy. Mr. Petersen will draft the letter to seek <br /> additional information and address the concerns of the Planning Board. <br /> -Town Planner recommended amendments <br /> BOARDCMS <br /> Old Business <br /> Mashpee Commons-Discussed earlier in the evening <br /> Green Parks Discussion-Discussed earlier in the evening <br /> Status of Planning Commissioners Journal subscription-The cost will remain the same at <br /> per year and will provide online access for up to 10 people. The new online version will <br /> also provide access to back issues. sixteen months of access will be provided at the same cost if <br /> the Board were to sign up prig to July. The warrant will be signed at the next meeting for the <br /> amount, but the funds-would be deducted from the next fish year. <br /> MOTION: Mr.Balzarini made a motion to take a vote to sign up for the basic 10. Mr. <br /> Ioharian seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. <br /> New Business <br /> Proposd Selectmen's street naming policy-fir. Fudala explained that the proposed <br /> policy would be presented to the Board of selectmen for adoption. Mr. Fudala stated that the <br /> Planning Board maintained the sole authority to approve street names under state law but that it <br /> would be beneficial to have the Town er's Addressing work Group first consider the <br /> proposed names. 'There was discussion about some of the policies, such as#4, #8 and 11. llrlr. <br /> Fudala recommended that policies 1-12 be adopted into the Subdivision Regulations. The Chair <br /> inquired whether the denial of a name would be communicated to the petitioner and Mr. Fudala <br />