Laserfiche WebLink
addressed through. DCPC. She also expressed her approval at <br /> having representatives of the surrounding towns present for <br /> their input/support of iashpee' s efforts . <br /> Torn Fdala raised the issue of traffic concerns .and <br /> possible coordination of planning along Route 130 as they <br /> relate to the neighboring towns . <br /> Deference Maps - Garr Praha provided state build-out <br /> project maps depicting those areas of developable land, and <br /> Ma!shpee zoning maps,. <br /> Torn Fudala provided Mashpee zoning maps indicating <br /> those projects that would be exempt from a DCPC. <br /> Dennis Bal arini suggested a common focus be placed <br /> upon addressing roadway/traffic/infrastructure and <br /> wastewater issues to be addressed by the surrounding towns <br /> together withMa-shpoe. <br /> There was brief discussion regarding impact fees . <br /> Margo Fenn clarified impact fees for certain improvements <br /> can be imposed, such as roadway -and wastewater. Case law <br /> dictates to certain limitations however. She agreed that <br /> case could possibly be made for infrastructure issues <br /> through the DCPC process. <br /> Lee Gurney questioned whether a joint DCPC with <br /> surrounding towns- would be politically practical . She <br /> suggested the lines of communication remain open and <br /> welcomed input and suggestions. <br /> Beverly Kane questioned how the Town of s-hpe could <br /> impose regulations on the surrounding towns . <br /> Margo Fenn -suggested the discussion be limited to the <br /> Town of Mashpee, noting however the importance of the <br /> surrounding towns being represented for informational <br /> purposes. <br /> Concerns: Traffic, Infrastructure, wastewater, <br /> Affordable Housing. <br /> DCPC Nomination Application Process <br /> 2 <br />