Laserfiche WebLink
approval of said modification and provided that the original special permit <br /> granting authority has authority to approve said proposed uses and development <br /> under the provisions of the zoning bylaw applicable to the expanded land area at <br /> the time of approval of said modification.'' <br /> Board Questions OVened @ 7:20 PAS <br /> Mr. Malone asked if in section a minor changes listed are inclusive of all the minor <br /> charges that the hoard can consider or is minor changes still left to the boards' decision. <br /> d"Inc udin ,J'changed to It <br /> such a " in subsection- (a). Also, subsection d "including,' <br /> was changed to "such as". Mr. l uchinski asked where the board draws the line between <br /> milaor and major. Mr. Fudala responded if the change is not b or c ,then it is . Mr. <br /> Iuchinski asked i d was cumulative? Mr. l~udala responded d is zoning, not process. <br /> In subsection d the following was added: "'which is in combination with previoza <br /> modificalions, ifany". Ms. Meiien'ng asked if the amendment as presented included <br /> changes suggested by Town Counsel. lair. Fudala and Ms. Dane responded that" ►es, it <br /> was a combination of suggestions both by Town Counsel and the Planning Dement'*. <br /> Is. sane asked ` hat if under b ,you obtained a change not more than o,then carve <br /> in under d for a 6 or 7 change,is it cumulative?"' Mr. Fudala responded, "That's a <br /> good point because the cuxnulative has to do with the process under ". Mr. I uchins i <br /> had a question relative to subsection e : `what is mean by"separate entity"'. Mr. <br /> F dala responded,"That in effect you draw a line and determine what is under the old <br /> zoning and what is under the new zoning". Mr. l alone.asked about subsection (b): <br /> "Does this activate.a Public Dearing if Planning Board believes,the project May <br /> potentially impact abutting land owners regardless of whether it's % " Mir. Fudala <br /> response was`fires". Question from ids. Kane about subsection a : "With regard to the <br /> minor change, what is the public's involvement to be protected?" fix. Fudala answered, <br /> "'it would only be on the agenda, no Public ear'ng." Mr. Malone asked homer this would <br /> affect willuwben , with the question directed to Ms. Lane. Ms. Lane's response was this <br /> was crafted ed in response to some issues raised by willowbend, not necessarily to allow <br /> Tillo 'bnd to do exactly what it's applied for. They tried to focus on the issues that <br /> would be of interest to the board, keeping in mind various situations that developed) <br /> around town with regard to old new zoning bylaws. This was crafted to offer a tool to the <br /> Planning Board to more easily and correctly make decisions in a principlcd way with <br /> regard to old partially built out development to a new one. Ms. Lane suggested this <br /> amendment be thought of as a series of screens-if it doesn't make it through the first <br /> one, try the second one, then the third one, and so on. Mr. Lane stated this amendment <br /> would still allow discretion on the Pl anni n g Board's part. <br /> Public Rearing Opened @ 7:35'PM <br /> Mark Mealy, Attorney, representing Willowbend spoke first, thanking the board for <br /> having the special meeting. 111r. Healey stated he.thought this amendment should apply <br /> to all special permits. Also,Mr. Healey feluthe successive screening is very appropriate. <br /> Mr. Healer pointed out that by adding 9 holes of golf, that would a 50% increase as a <br /> use. Clearly,that is not a minor rnodi tcation as stated under a or b ;however,d hTnits <br /> 3 <br />