Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> ■ <br /> Motion To Amend Article 32, Line 9, to Add "and maintained" <br /> Motion: Martine �eijering bonded: Dennis BaLurini <br /> Vote: 3 Unanimous <br /> Article 34 <br /> Explanation: In reviewing and approving article 27 of the October 1999 Annual Town <br /> Meeting ,the AttorneyGeneral"s office noted that the Town had previously <br /> adopted'another Subsection l 74- .0 regarding Wireless Facilities and suggested that this <br /> corrective article be-file. As there is also a Subsection 17405.D. the proposed <br /> renumbering is to 174- .E. <br /> Motion to Recommend Renumbering <br /> Motion: Martine M ij rin bonded: Dennis BaUsrini <br /> Vote: 3-0 Unanimous <br /> Article 3 <br /> Explanation: In reviewing an amendment adapted under article 9 of the warmnt for the <br /> October 7, '1991 Annual Town Meeting warrant, the Attorney General's office noted that <br /> amendments to the zoning bylaw had left Subsection 174-79.B with subsections(1),(2), <br /> (3), 4 and 7 and suggested that we renumber subsection 7 to become to avoid any <br /> confusion because of out-of-sequence numbering. This article would do s . <br /> Motion to Recommend Renumbering <br /> Motion: DennisBaLzarini Seconded: Martine 1 leijerin <br /> Vote; 3-0 Unanimous <br /> Article 3 <br /> Explanation: Recent legal opinions by Town Counsel have pointed out that the <br /> Planning Board and Z A have no clear authority to modify special permit projects, <br /> parxcula.rlr where the project proposed to be modified was approved under zoning <br /> standards which are no longer in erect. Any "modification"would, in fact,have to be <br /> done as a new special permit application.under currently applicable zo.Wing. This has <br /> created a difficult situation for projects that have been begun but are not}yet completed <br /> and wish to modify their plans or permit language. This article would create authority for <br /> special permit modifications of three sorts; minor site plan changes could be done at a <br /> public mpg but without advertisement of a public hearing, more significant site plan <br /> changes} or changes to the text or the pernxit decision would require an advertised public <br /> hearing with notice to all abutters within300 feet and full conformance with all special <br /> permit approval requirements. For changes involving an increase of 10% or less in <br /> building area or the area of land occupied by a particular type 1 of use,the old zoning <br /> applicable to the property when the original permit was approved would continue to <br /> apply. For any larger change, currently applicable zoning standards would have to be <br /> met. No increase m the number of permitted dwelling units or in the.rate of development <br />