Laserfiche WebLink
Ilk <br /> 1 <br /> 4 � <br /> t <br /> n► <br /> Chairman Kuchinski stated that they will sign the forms at the end of the meeting. <br /> Z ryt L <br /> Note:At the d f the nteetm* forms could no be signed e n a Notary en � g, d � sign because ther was of <br /> present. Forms will be brought to the next Planning Board meeting if they are not signed. # <br /> before. "`y <br /> 1 <br /> •"W D IM EO T APPLI Al�TT IN �1T IIEvELt:�P1VIENT G] UP <br /> REVIEW OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS: <br /> .Mr.Mike Roberts,Project Manager for Wnndchfime Point,was present representing <br /> Windchime Development Group,Ltd. <br /> Applicant: Windchime Point development Group,Ltd. t <br /> Location: Windchime Point,Great Neck Road South <br /> Request: RMew of architectural plans for perimeter buildings. , <br /> Mr.Roberts referred to a letter sent to Windchime from Briggs Engineering in reference to <br /> Consulting Engineer Rowley's concern on reprocessed ashphalt. He presented the <br /> Massachusetts Highway book with the information relating to this issue circled and that they <br /> comply. Mr.Roberts noted that Massachusetts g way does not reference reprocesse <br /> d <br /> asphalt. Chairman Kuchinski noted that there is an amendment to what he presented that <br /> deals with reprocessed asphalt. Chairman Kuchinski noted that the book is old and there is a <br /> new spec that came out about 1997 and the book he has came out in 1996. Mr.Roberts stated F ' <br /> that he will check with his engineers on this issue. <br /> • f V <br /> Chairman Kuchinski asked Mr.Roberts if he had any core samples. He said he did not have �! <br /> any samples based on the following <br /> 1'.}r <br /> ineer, •f,, <br /> Mr.Roberts stated that they called Mr.Charles Rowley,Consulting En g to inspect` and .r <br /> he was unable to do it in the timeframe they gave him. Mr.Roberts stated that they then <br /> called Mr.Charles Hauck,Mashpee Building Inspector,and asked him what to do at that t ' <br /> point. Mr.Roberts stated they were informed by Mr.fiauck that if they brought an t, <br /> independent en in to do all the testing,that would satisfy him. Mr.Roberts added that � . <br /> eP agency <br /> they then brought Briggs Engineering in to do the testing and Briggs Engineering did all the <br /> testing including the sieve analysis;and the results of these tests were submitted as proof that <br /> the road was done properly. t } <br /> Motion to R uest Core Sam les: <br /> A motion was made by Dennis Balzarini,second by Matthew Malone, is <br /> to have Windchime Point Develoment Group take core samples. - <br /> qi <br /> Mr.Roberts questioned what the reason would be for requesting the core samples since the . <br /> Agent for the Board was instructing them what to do and has them do something completely <br /> different. For this reason he asked why would the Board take an opinion and have them . , <br /> expend more mane to o back and do something that the Planning Board's agent had them " ,:I i.J <br /> xp Y g fi <br /> do differently. <br /> . • • the told them to do. ; <br /> till: <br /> Chairman Kuchinski questioned whether Bill Hauck put it in writing wha <br /> Mr.Roberts stated that he will get it put in writing. <br /> Ili <br /> F <br /> i <br /> 11 k� <br />