Laserfiche WebLink
ll m. Storrs has calculated that 0%of the square footage will be used for retail <br /> and 0 for office space. The parking demands have been tructured upon thi's <br /> calculation. He reminded the Board that completion ofeach phase will require a review <br /> of-all of the construction documents within the infm ru tur Mn i n by Mr. Rowley. <br /> He stated it is not his intent to diminish the Planning Board process, and that he does <br /> defer to Town Counsel in the respect that the Planning Board is entitled to a review. <br /> There was some discussion regarding the parking requirements with Mr. Storrs <br /> explaining that detailed plans are required as each phase is brought forward. Both the <br /> Zoning Board of Appeals and Cape Cod Commission pe uts require that the conunercial <br /> space.parking demand be met on street, and the residential be met on site. Two spaces <br /> for any residential unit with more than two-bedrooms and one space for a,one-b droom <br /> unit has been approved. However, every live/work unit that shows two parking spaces on <br /> its lot also shows a third space called a shadow parking space that would enable the <br /> Zoning Board of Appear to require the addition of one more parking space should it be <br /> determined the parking demand is greater than anticipated. <br /> The Chairman reiterated that all Board Members complete a thorough review of <br /> the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Cape Cod Commission Decisions this matter, <br /> cautioning everyone to focus only on the commercial aspect of this project. <br /> The Chairman asked whether or not Mr. Rowley would be able to act as Planning <br /> Board Consulting Engineer light of the fact that be had participated in the Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals Decision. <br /> Attorney Costello responded that he feels there would be no conflict due to the <br /> fact that there are two separate Boards acting on behalf and in the interest of the Town. <br /> The purpose of this meeting was to provide an outline to the Planning Board in order to <br /> establish an.agenda for review. Mr. owley's prior knowledge and relationship to the <br /> Planning Board 'Should not conflict with his impartial and constructive consulting to the <br /> Board. <br /> The Chairman stated she has a general concern at this point for storrnwater runoff. <br /> Both the Planning Board and Environmental Oversight Committee are extremely <br /> interested in storrnwater runoff`and its treatment in-terms of water quality and the <br /> reduction of nitrogen. She suggested this project demonstrate Best Management <br /> Practices. <br /> Attorney Costello agreed that this concern is critical in that this project is <br /> comprised of buildings and that this area should be examined carefully while being <br /> cognizant of the prior approvals/waivers granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals. <br /> Mr. Rowley Arley informed the Board that he had met early on with Mr. Storrs and his <br /> engineers to discuss this issue. He voiced the concerns of the Planning Board at this <br /> initial meeting.regarding the use of Best Management Practices, however this project is <br /> unique in that In some cases the use of said practices would be difficult. There are <br /> 7 <br />