Laserfiche WebLink
Addressing the issue of noise impacts, Mr. Joyal stated his <br /> site emanates less noise, the figure being 52 . He stated he <br /> would mitigate down to whatever level the Board deems <br /> appropriate. <br /> Mr. Joyal concluded his presentation at this point., ma i-ng <br /> himself available to answer any questions . <br /> In response to a question by Don Myers, Mr. Joyal stated <br /> the noise level mentioned previously did include that of the <br /> backup generator. <br /> The. Chairman asked about the bond for dismantling of the <br /> tower. Mr. Joyal responded $10, 000. o surety is customary unless, <br /> otherwise s eci-f ied by the Board. <br /> Steve Dolan asked about the fall zone. area, active traffic <br /> within the 150-ft. 75-ft. <br /> Nor. Joyal responded there will be an application within the <br /> to-ft . on a daily basis; within the 7 -ft. perhaps once a week, <br /> once a month, according to the owner. <br /> Steve Dolan expressed concern regarding enforcement of <br /> traffic in the event the storage business is replaced by some <br /> other sort of business after the Special Permit is granted. <br /> Mr,. Jo ral was receptive to signing an affidavit on a six <br /> month basis indicating his compliance. <br /> The Town Planner asked about the owner' .personal office <br /> being located within the 75-ft. <br /> Mr. Jo ral answered the. owner will maintain a personal office <br /> there but that he has indicated he will not be utilizing the <br /> Office space or subletting it out to anyone else_ This location <br /> i not considered to be the primary place of business . The <br /> primary location is in Guest Barnstable. <br /> The Chairman recognized Walter Sullivan, an attorney from <br /> Norwell, Massachusetts, representing Mr. Stephen Comelletti who <br /> owns property where Industrial Communications and Electronics, <br /> Ind. are proposing Location of their tower. It was he who raised <br /> the variance issue, not as competitor- but because the site is <br /> available and not being used. Whereas someone is already making <br /> money from the use of the other site being proposed. <br /> Having raised the issue of variance, Attorney Sullivan <br /> thought that perhaps the sea Coast proposed location would be <br /> defined ineligible because it does not meet the standards . <br /> Attorney Sullivan made reference to Section E- , page 53 of <br /> the By-law being designed to ac omm date maximum density and use <br /> -21- <br />