My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/04/1998 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
02/04/1998 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2022 5:04:02 PM
Creation date
1/26/2022 2:11:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/04/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Attorney Darrine made the argument that the road under w' <br /> discussion existed prior to the adoption of the Subdivision fit <br /> Control Law. He entertained the idea of improving a road that <br /> has been in existence since the early 19001s; which would note <br /> be creating a roadway. <br /> Mr. Rowley further commented the determination has to be 'r� <br /> made from the standpoint of what exists today. He is of the <br /> opinion this matter will have to o through the subdivision <br /> P g g r <br /> .•Y process. 1 <br /> There was some discussion regarding road access/roadways + <br /> indicated on Land Court Plan. The Town Planner suggested <br /> Applicant consider developing a Cluster Subdivision. i', �� <br /> y: Ni ' N , <br /> The Chairman determined t to be the duty of the Planning <br /> a_ Board to observe the adequacy of access, requiring a site visit <br /> `K prior to making a decision in this matter. <br /> Applicant filed Application, Fee, and f ive (5) copies of the <br /> Plan. <br /> • f i f <br /> The Board agreed to meet at the site on Saturday, February �,' <br /> ?, 1998, at 8 ■ 30 a.m. , and to continue this matter to February ,►, <br /> 18, 1998 . (This matter concluded at 9 : 0 5 p.m. ) <br /> lit F � <br /> The Chairman declared a recess at this point, 9 : 05 p.m. � <br /> Other Items <br /> ,1 tiY3� <br /> Jim Hanks <br /> Discussion of Continuation of Flushing Analysis for Mashpee River <br /> M� <br /> i t P, <br /> The Meeting was reconvened at 9 -13 p.m, at which point the <br /> Chairman recognized Mr. Hanks, who introduced himself and Gerry <br /> g Y <br /> Daley from the waterways Commission. <br /> Mr. Hanks made reference to a Design Phase of Dredging Ma ■ <br /> He explained the objective is to study the effects of dredging <br /> increments going along the River of both leaving dredging <br /> material in the water, and removing dredging material from the <br /> water. Theoretical) leaving material in the water k v y, g keeps volume ►,�, �, <br /> the same which means there is less need for dissolution. He <br /> suggested that by leaving materials in the water creates )IN <br /> islands/marsh which results in better flow, confined channels, <br /> and more sediment transport. He stated the Army Corps of ►g <br /> Engineers, Division of Marine Fisheries and EPA will not allow <br /> the sediment to abut the marsh. The purpose of this study is � <br /> to narrow down design aspects. He suggested these scenarios <br /> . f <br /> '= would be helpful in determining how far u the River would be <br /> xg= p g p <br /> productive to dredge. , 1, ; <br /> Mr. Hanks noted a previous allocation in the amount of <br /> Fifty Five Hundred ($5 5 0 0 . o o) Dollars, of which Thirty Five <br /> � f �b <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.