Laserfiche WebLink
All Board Members proceeded to sin three copies of i � <br /> g p said � <br /> Release forms and upon acknowledgement ' <br /> p� gement this was the free act and, <br /> deed of the Board, signatures were notarized by the Board <br /> Secretary. (This matter concluded at 7:42 p.m. ) ��,r <br /> Public Hearing - <br /> Approval . <br /> , <br /> of Mashpee Local Comprehensive Plan <br /> NOTE.- There were approximately eight (8) members of the <br /> 0 <br /> public in attendance for this portion of the Planning ll <br /> � p ng Board <br /> Meeting. <br /> b <br /> i Please refer to document prepared out of context as required ' <br /> ri'Zn <br /> b the Cape Cod Commission Y p s s ion for purposes of filing the Town of <br /> Mashpee Local Comprehensive master Plan and at the request of the <br /> Town Planner, Mr. Fudal a, Separate document n - " <br /> p � numbered pages 1- <br /> throw h -9- , provided herewith g p to be interpreted as part of the <br /> Min � <br /> k utes of the February 18, 1998 Town of Mashpee Planning Board <br /> Meeting. <br /> 06 <br /> ' Approval N ' <br /> Not Required <br /> red <br /> �,7::_.e;.•: Andrew L ipno skY-Ca e & Islands Engineering-Pimlico Pond Road <br /> „ t <br /> j- Endorsement of 6-Lot ANR Plan-Continued from February 4, 1998 <br /> Planning Board M ` <br /> and F <br /> ;..,._. Meeting ing February 7 9 9 8 On Site � <br /> _ to v1S.it '"'� <br /> 1 <br /> NOTE. There were three (3) abutters to th <br /> e e property under �. <br /> discussion in attendance, Karen Jackson Sandra and Thom <br /> a s � <br /> Mackey. ` y]/ <br /> H'Fr' <br /> The Chairman recognized Attorney Karrine and asked him to � <br /> � <br /> u deliver a brief presentation as to why this Plan should be <br /> `= considered an ANR for signature by the Board. : <br /> Attorney Karrine stated the 1 `Y sole determination of this issue <br /> � .. <br /> is defined under C41 Section 81-L It being ` <br /> g his impression the <br /> r ti n <br /> Board has ignored the fact that the zoning Board of Appeals,s, b <br /> pp , <br /> r way of granting certain various variance relief in connection <br /> on said,with this site had imposed significant conditions u <br /> p <br /> == variance relief requiring significant improvement, 'includingt= <br /> pavement on John Ewer Road in order to conform with Fire <br /> Department Bylaw Requirements. He interpreted the Board to be <br /> = zr more focused upon the current condition of the roadway, rather <br /> 1 than future roadway improvements. <br /> i rt} t ,f�F'�• <br /> r : In his opinion, Attorney Karrine interpreted conditions � 1 +j' <br /> nH imposed by the Board of Appeals, would meet the standard of C. 41 )Owl <br /> { Section 81-L. He determined the Board, is obligated to make a <br /> determination as to whether or not the road i fsufficient.� s o w <br /> :s• # width, suitable grade, and adequate construction to provide for <br /> the vehicular needs generated by six (6) lots and six (6) single <br /> family <br /> g <br /> residences. Should the Board determine two (2) of the <br /> lots exit on Pimlico Pond Road, the issue would be four (4) <br /> sl e family residential lots. tit <br /> _ ng1 , <br /> • psi <br /> 41 <br /> � u <br /> 1 <br />