Laserfiche WebLink
to the Town, in order to determine a clear-'cut line. (Mr oJala <br /> a� <br /> . <br /> appeared to be in agreement. ) <br /> Chance Reichel asked if the Consulting En ineer has seen h � � <br /> Plan. The Town Planner r g � the ��� <br /> responded "He}�He should have, ,, as it had <br /> been submitted previously for review at this Meeting. <br /> a <br /> � <br /> As the ConsultingEngineer :!g was expected to attend this <br /> Meeting, the Town Planner suggested the Board wait for his <br /> arrival and benefit from his input prior to taking an action. <br /> . <br /> The Town Planner also clarified = <br /> that Lots �. 6, 7, and the <br /> street are the items for review at this Meeting. <br /> g <br /> Chance Relchel asked for the Town Planner's determination <br /> the question of lot frontage of <br /> of Lot 5. The Town Planner stated <br /> it appeared to be "okay. " and that it met the Bylaw criteria. <br /> z <br /> Mr. Cj al a produced the initial Plan signed by the Planning <br /> Board entitled,, "Plan of Land in Mashpee, Area to be Dismissed <br /> and Severed Sheet 1. Land Court Plan 36125A, dated September 16, <br /> 1975. 11 This Plan severed the locus from the initial Land Court ► <br /> parcel, as it was found that there was an owner of the parcel, J I <br /> and the boundarywas set with l <br /> , t cement markers. which well be shown � <br /> on the Definitive Plan. <br /> The Chairman determined the Board should await the arrival <br /> of the Consulting Engineer. (This matter was recessed at 7:30 <br /> P. . <br /> } , <br /> .m. �. <br /> Discussion Anthony LaCava-Baxter & Nye <br /> Quashnet Valley - Snead Drive Extension <br /> The Chairman recognized Mr. Baxter from Baxter & Nye and. <br /> Attorney Karrine, <br /> W <br /> Mr. Baxter recalled he appeared before the Board two weeks I::''+ <br /> ago to discuss the Snead Drive Extension, at which point it had <br /> been decided to research the Records of the previous Meeting in � + <br /> 1994 when Snead Drive had been constructed to a point just past <br /> Nelson Circle. He acknowledged having received copies of the ,f,4, <br /> Minutes of that Meeting. <br /> Mr. Baxter stated that the drainage issue was being <br /> di s cussed in 1994, which had been designed twenty (2 o) ears <br /> y „►� <br /> previous (1976) . Most of the conversation centered around how <br /> the drainage would be improved to current standards. He noted <br /> there was not much discussion beyond the construction detail . F <br /> The Chairman read aloud from the November 1994 Minutes, <br /> The Chairman then recalled other issues of concern to be the ?i+r <br /> total lengthout; <br /> g of access to get there with no other way and ,, oft <br /> -3- <br /> ,� •fir <br /> ' F <br />