Laserfiche WebLink
}4 <br /> 1 1:•I, <br /> of one hundred ninety (190) was exceeded last year. <br /> i <br /> .l jf 1 <br /> Also, the last paragraph which establishes s a two . <br /> (2) year deadline to clarify improvements in excess of 11x11 <br /> number <br /> of lots coordinated with the growth control of the subdivisio <br /> n. <br /> The Planning Board determined this to be' a Subdivision y " <br /> Developer/Planning Board issue. The Town Planner i; d d agree to <br /> remove the phrase referring to the BuildingDepartment, <br /> partment. � <br /> Page 7-9, clarify last paragraph. The Chairman reported th <br /> zBA suggestion of not specifying e <br /> any growth Centers. The Town ,.I <br /> Planner agreed to change the word "not, to "only a few clear-cut <br /> ear-cut ' <br /> candidates. " Y <br /> J <br /> �t ! <br /> Page 9-2, second paragraph, In addition, the Town should . <br /> refrain from granting lot size variances that make lots buildable ,!, <br /> which are not legitimately g Y protected under the Town and State <br /> grandfathering clause. ft The Town Planner suggested the language <br /> be changed from " . . .refrain from. . . with if . . * <br /> be conservative <br /> c„ <br /> in. . . , �� to which the Planning Board agreed. � <br /> 4; <br /> Page 9-6, Landscaping, keep uniform, a repetition of -4, x ; <br /> The change to be made is from "specific,, to "general. " <br /> Page 9-9, third paragraph, is a repeat issue, 10, o00 to <br /> 15, 000 cluster plans. <br /> Page 9-101 Inconsistent changes were brought to the Planning o, <br /> Board' s attention, and is a repeat of earlier changes agreed to N- <br /> with reference to co-housing and residential . <br /> com ounds °' <br /> p � <br /> f; <br /> Page 9-11. The zBA has requested this sentence be stricken <br /> "The Town might also consider adoption, if legal, of a v,y <br /> building p g maximum <br /> size limit in those areas for the same reason, <br /> particularly if "big box" retail is not considered desirable b <br /> Town Meeting. The Planning Board determined this Issue should <br /> be raised for discussion at Town meetingif anyone has objections ,' <br /> to it, <br /> y <br /> Page 9-12 . The zBA has requested '� . . .all Boards, <br /> qu Planning <br /> Board and zBA. The Town Planner explained this is referring to <br /> Special Permit � r <br /> regulations and each Board adopts their own. The r, <br /> Chairman recalled discussion/language suggestion' to read, 7, <br /> gg , <br /> should be developed b the relevant Boards. i' The Town P r }' <br /> clarifiedy Zanner <br /> this is a suggestion that the Planning Board adopt <br /> Special Permit regulations. The Planning Board does not H; <br /> currently have Special Permit regulations; the zBA does. After <br /> some discussion, it was decided to include the words �� . , . it' s <br /> own. , . <br /> Page 9-15 . Mr. Reichel stated this was a repeat issue, <br /> 10, 000 square feet. "Requirements for 121, berm or curbing along <br /> the entire <br /> length of new subdivision streets as recommended by <br /> -5- <br /> h• <br /> 1�q. <br /> a' <br /> f,• <br />